mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GRPO-QPS: Target-Preserving Reinforcement Learning for Quantum Posterior Sampling

arXiv 2609.14711 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2026cs.LG quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bayesian quantum tomography requires efficient inference while preserving a posterior fixed by the prior and Born likelihood. Learned transport provides fast amortized samples, but reward tuning can reshape the generated distribution rather than improve exploration of this fixed target. We introduce GRPO-QPS, a target-preserving framework in which GRPO learns proposal behavior and an exact Metropolis correction preserves the posterior after training. Across the evaluated reconstruction benchmarks, GRPO-QPS improves over BuresTomFlow and Flow-GRPO on thermal, cat, Dicke, and cluster families, and it closely matches an exact two-qubit reference posterior. Tuned conventional MCMC is slightly stronger on several original continuous benchmarks where the available fixed proposals already match the posterior geometry well. To test whether this reflects a fundamental limitation of learned exploration, we evaluate a more challenging multimodal thermal posterior. At six qubits and 800 shots, the learned proposal achieves a minimum effective sample size of 102 per 1,000 likelihood calls, compared with 28 for prior independence, 27 for a tuned fixed mixture, and 20 for Haario adaptive Metropolis. A record-conditioned policy also transfers to unseen 3,000-shot records, matching or exceeding the strongest conventional baseline in all nine held-out seed-record comparisons. These results show that GRPO-QPS combines target-preserving Bayesian inference with broad gains over learned transport baselines and a sampling advantage when efficient exploration requires proposal geometry beyond the evaluated conventional kernels.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 24 references.

References · 11

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  3. 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RLcited by 605
  4. 2023Flow Matching on General Geometriescited by 260
  5. 2020Predicting Many Properties of a Quantum System from Very Few Measurementscited by 229
  6. 2024Adjoint Matching: Fine-tuning Flow and Diffusion Generative Models with Memoryless Stochastic Optimal Controlcited by 222
  7. 2017Generalizing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Neural Networkscited by 52
  8. 2022Flexible learning of quantum states with generative query neural networkscited by 16
  9. 2024Markovian Flow Matching: Accelerating MCMC with Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 9
  10. 2024Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive MCMCcited by 4
  11. 2025Harnessing the Power of Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive MCMCcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026QuPID: Quantum Parameter-Efficient Input-Dependent Retrieval Adaptation for Medical RAG
  2. 2025Quantum Reinforcement Learning-Guided Diffusion Model for Image Synthesis via Hybrid Quantum-Classical Generative Model Architectures
  3. 2026U-DAVI: Uncertainty-Aware Diffusion-Prior-Based Amortized Variational Inference for Image Reconstruction
  4. 2025Overcoming Dimensional Factorization Limits in Discrete Diffusion Models through Quantum Joint Distribution Learning
  5. 2026Calibrated Test-Time Guidance for Bayesian Inference
  6. 2026An Hybrid Quantum-Classical Diffusion Model for Image Generation
  7. 2026Tempered Guided Diffusion
  8. 2023Variational Bayesian Imaging with an Efficient Surrogate Score-based Prior