mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Just add noise: Debiasing tree-based variable importance in mixed data

arXiv 2609.14083 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2026stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Variable importance scores from tree-based methods such as random forests favor continuous predictors over categorical ones. We present a theoretical analysis of this bias and propose a simple remedy: add a small amount of noise to each categorical predictor. The correction is demonstrated on a variety of simulated and real-world datasets and combined with integrated path stability selection to perform variable selection with false discovery control for mixed data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2026.

Builds on

8 of 22 references.

References · 8

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
  3. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 140
  4. 2019Unbiased Measurement of Feature Importance in Tree-Based Methodscited by 30
  5. 2019A Debiased MDI Feature Importance Measure for Random Forestscited by 24
  6. 2020Trees, forests, and impurity-based variable importancecited by 16
  7. 2024Integrated path stability selectioncited by 2
  8. 2024Nonparametric IPSS: Fast, flexible feature selection with false discovery controlcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.