mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Real-World Deployment and Performance Characterisation of Fog-Based Deep Learning for Cold-Chain Temperature Prediction over LoRaWAN

arXiv 2609.14036 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2026cs.DC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fresh fruits and vegetables (FFVs) are highly perishable, and cold-chain breaks contribute significantly to global food waste. While Machine Learning (ML) can enable proactive intervention, cloud-based inference faces challenges such as latency and data loss. Fog computing addresses these issues but has been tested only in simulation for FFV cold-chain temperature prediction. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper presents its first real-world deployment. A fog-deployed LSTM-GRU model predicted cold-room temperature using LoRaWAN sensor data collected from a South African apple cold-storage facility with induced cold-chain breaks. Running entirely on a Raspberry Pi 4 with no cloud dependency, the system generated conditional SHAP explanations only when a break is predicted. The deployed system predicts cold-room temperature with an MAE of 0.2degC at roughly 0.2 kWh per day (≈ 0.7 Wh per prediction). Predictions were delivered in under one second (555 ms), dominated by network and messaging rather than computation, with conditional explanations adding modest cost. SHAP consumes 28% more CPU but is well within the hardware's capacity. The model attributes its predictions primarily to temperature, humidity, and their interaction. Critically, the deployment surfaced what simulation cannot: a sensor-triggered single point of failure, alongside genuine resilience, autonomous recovery from infrastructure faults and continued operation through internet loss. These are the first published deployment benchmarks for fog-based temperature prediction in FFV cold chains, establishing that explainable temperature forecasting is feasible on resource-constrained edge hardware. Future work includes asynchronous sensor fusion, commercial cold chain deployment, alternative model architectures, and causal analysis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2026.

Builds on

1 of 21 references.

References · 1

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555

Built on by

Not cited yet.