mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Positioning manuscripts in the scientific landscape with agentic AI

arXiv 2609.13760 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Publishing a research manuscript is a routine yet demanding part of scientific life: time-consuming, stressful, and often uncertain in outcome. Recent advances in large language model (LLM)-based agentic AI have shown promise across a range of scientific tasks, and here we ask whether agentic AI can help researchers navigate the publication process itself by reliably inferring a manuscript's eventual publication venue from its content and literature context. We introduce PASS (Publication-oriented Agentic Scientific System), an agentic system that understands manuscripts within their domain-specific literature context and predicts top-matched publication venues. PASS positions each manuscript within its surrounding literature landscape by reconstructing its local scientific neighborhood, tracing its topic trajectory, and reasoning over field-specific journal spaces. Evaluated on a leakage-audited benchmark of over 2,000 preprints across 16 biomedical fields, PASS achieved Top-1 accuracy of 50.3% and Top-5 accuracy of 86.1%, outperforming state-of-the-art LLM baselines and established journal-selection tools. PASS-produced quality scores, such as impact potential and novelty, aligned with independent measures of publication outcome. We also found that the designed literature retrieval module is the strongest performance contributor, particularly for positioning manuscripts relative to nearby work, and that PASS maintained near-full performance from the abstract alone, whereas LLM baselines required the full manuscript text. An independent human evaluation found strong researcher agreement with PASS's manuscript understanding and recommendation rationale. PASS has been released as a public platform (https://ratemypaper.ai/) for broad researcher access.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2026.

Builds on

12 of 26 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  3. 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,210
  4. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  5. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  6. 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 401
  7. 2024Empowering Biomedical Discovery with AI Agentscited by 118
  8. 2025DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking Processcited by 100
  9. 2025An AI system to help scientists write expert-level empirical softwarecited by 60
  10. 2025Spark: A System for Scientifically Creative Idea Generationcited by 11
  11. 2026AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guidecited by 11
  12. 2021Human-Centered AI for Data Science: A Systematic Approachcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Prompt-to-Paper: Agentic AI System for Bioinformatics
  2. 2026Agentic Publication Protocol: An Attempt to Modernize Scientific Publication
  3. 2025Agentic publications: redesigning scientific publishing in the age of thinking large language models
  4. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Search
  5. 2026Towards Automating Scientific Review with Google's Paper Assistant Tool
  6. 2026Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Research
  7. 2024CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmark
  8. 2025REPRO-Bench: Can Agentic AI Systems Assess the Reproducibility of Social Science Research?