Inside VLM Chart Reading: Tracing Value Reading from Vertical Bar Charts Across Space and Depth
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision--language models (VLMs) can answer chart questions accurately, but output accuracy does not show how they combine the evidence needed to recover an exact value. We study vertical-bar value reading with controlled counterfactual activation patching in Qwen2.5VL-7B-Instruct and InternVL3.5-8B. The study connects three analyses: (1) The single-factor results show that the changed bar-top region restores much more answer preference than the unchanged bar body, despite containing fewer visual tokens. Legend- and series-related states also lose local recoverability earlier than bar-geometry and axis-scale states. (2) In the handoff analysis, restoration shifts from visual legend regions in early layers to prompt-series positions in middle layers. Resetting the prompt-series state selectively reduces legend-source rescue, supporting its role as a partial mediator. (3) In the factorial analysis, both models can use geometry and scale states from separate donors to favor the combined target. InternVL performs similarly when the states come from separate donors or one image, while Qwen shows lower restoration for separate donors which suggests higher context sensitivity. Together, these results provide preliminary causal evidence for localizing the internal computations that support exact bar-value reading.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2026.
Builds on
14 of 19 references.
References · 14
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 359
- 2019PlotQA: Reasoning over Scientific Plotscited by 321
- 2017FigureQA: An Annotated Figure Dataset for Visual Reasoningcited by 319
- 2022DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translationcited by 160
- 2023UniChart: A Universal Vision-language Pretrained Model for Chart Comprehension and Reasoningcited by 160
- 2022MatCha: Enhancing Visual Language Pretraining with Math Reasoning and Chart Derenderingcited by 133
- 2023ChartBench: A Benchmark for Complex Visual Reasoning in Chartscited by 120
- 2025ChartQAPro: A More Diverse and Challenging Benchmark for Chart Question Answeringcited by 108
- 2023Towards Vision-Language Mechanistic Interpretability: A Causal Tracing Tool for BLIPcited by 62
2 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Losing the Plot: How VLM responses degrade on imperfect charts
- 2024Unraveling the Truth: Do VLMs really Understand Charts? A Deep Dive into Consistency and Robustness
- 2025Probing the Visualization Literacy of Vision Language Models: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
- 2025ChartMuseum: Testing Visual Reasoning Capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025On the Perception Bottleneck of VLMs for Chart Understanding
- 2025Do MLLMs Really Understand the Charts?
- 2025RefChartQA: Grounding Visual Answer on Chart Images through Instruction Tuning
- 2026Which Source Wins? Task-Dependent Reliance in Vision-Language Models