mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Causal multi-modal AI for personalized chemosensitivity prediction

arXiv 2609.13567 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Chemotherapy improves survival for some patients with breast cancer, but doctors cannot reliably predict who. Current guidelines rely on recurrence scores as a proxy for treatment benefit, which may contribute to the overprescription of chemotherapy. Here we present a causal multi-modal AI model that predicts personalized chemosensitivity using routinely collected pathology and clinical information. We developed our model on a multi-national dataset of 9,141 patients (twelve cohorts, nine countries) and evaluated it on another 1,994 patients (five cohorts, three countries). The model generated treatment-specific recurrence probabilities for each patient, with near-perfect calibration and strong prognostic discrimination across both 5- and 10-year follow-up horizons. Moreover, its chemotherapy benefit predictions demonstrated robust predictive performance, and out-performed existing recurrence-score-based tests. Compared to the standard of care, using the model to support personally tailored therapeutic decisions could reduce the number of patients receiving chemotherapy by 30% while achieving the same recurrence-free rate. Tumors predicted to be highly chemosensitive displayed concordant molecular and morphological programs of proliferation, cell cycle progression, and replication stress. The model's predictive capabilities transferred zero-shot to non-breast cancers, indicating our causal multi-modal AI approach may provide a universal strategy to predict treatment outcomes across cancer types.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 127 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 127 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  5. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  6. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  7. 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 745
  8. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
  9. 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
  10. 2016Learning Representations for Counterfactual Inferencecited by 329
  11. 2022Semiparametric doubly robust targeted double machine learning: a reviewcited by 133
  12. 2020Deep Learning-based Computational Pathology Predicts Origins for Cancers of Unknown Primarycited by 89
9 more
  1. 2019A Comparative Analysis of XGBoostcited by 80
  2. 2024Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomescited by 74
  3. 2018A Scalable Discrete-Time Survival Model for Neural Networkscited by 72
  4. 2019Continuous and Discrete-Time Survival Prediction with Neural Networkscited by 70
  5. 2023FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcarecited by 60
  6. 2020Differences between human and machine perception in medical diagnosiscited by 13
  7. 2024Conformalized Survival Distributions: A Generic Post-Process to Increase Calibrationcited by 10
  8. 2023Benchmarking state-of-the-art gradient boosting algorithms for classificationcited by 4
  9. 2024Multi-modal AI for comprehensive breast cancer prognosticationcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.