Do Tabular Foundation Models Still Need Feature Engineering?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Feature engineering has long been a cornerstone of tabular machine learning. Tabular foundation models (TFMs) are pretrained on a wide range of tabular datasets and applied via in-context learning. Their rise raises a natural question: does manual feature construction still matter as these models become more capable? To answer this, we perform a controlled study across several versions of two major TFM families, testing a wide range of existing feature engineering techniques on benchmark datasets from TabArena. We find a consistent pattern: feature engineering gains are concentrated in earlier model generations and become negligible for the strongest models. These results suggest that stronger TFMs depend less on explicitly engineered input representations. In a complementary experiment, however, adding in-context information from related datasets still improves performance. Our findings indicate a shift in the source of performance gains for stronger TFMs: re-representing existing inputs becomes less effective, while providing additional task-relevant context remains beneficial.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2026.
Builds on
7 of 22 references.
References · 7
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 674
- 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 289
- 2021Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 214
- 2025TabArena: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Datacited by 176
- 2024Retrieval & Fine-Tuning for In-Context Tabular Modelscited by 59
- 2017An Empirical Analysis of Feature Engineering for Predictive Modelingcited by 29
- 2026TabPrep: Closing the Feature Engineering Gap in Tabular Benchmarkscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.