mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A derivative-fidelity failure mode in physics-informed neural networks: strengthened benchmark evidence from function-value training

arXiv 2609.13171 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) use automatic differentiation to impose differential-equation residuals, but good agreement in function values does not necessarily imply accurate derivatives. This paper formulates derivative fidelity as a failure mode of PINNs and tests it with one-dimensional benchmarks. Multilayer perceptrons are trained only on function values for sin(x) and exp(x), while second derivatives obtained by automatic differentiation are evaluated separately. The hypothesis is strengthened by additional tests over training-point density, activation functions, endpoint-dense evaluation, and both L2 and maximum-error diagnostics. The results show that visually accurate function approximation can coexist with substantially larger second-derivative errors, especially near high-curvature boundary regions. The experiment provides a diagnostic protocol for distinguishing value accuracy from physics-residual reliability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2026.

Builds on

2 of 9 references.

References · 2

  1. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  2. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619

Built on by

Not cited yet.