mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Interpreting the predictions of neural network classification based on a Taylor Coefficient Analysis (TCA)

arXiv 2609.12801 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2026cs.AI physics.data-ancited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce a rigid and comprehensive taxonomy and paradigm for characterizing the influence of the input feature space X on the predictions haty of a neural network (NN) used for event classification, based on a Taylor expansion of haty in X. The complete process of introspection we refer to as Taylor Coefficient Analysis (TCA). Based on two simplistic example tasks, which can be easily understood and bencmarked, we illustrate the power of the TCA when it comes to revealing, what properties of X have led to what value of haty, of a given NN model, building up intuition for the method. A more complex application is meant to represent X of a typical classification task at a CERN LHC experiment. Based on this application, we play through the different levels of introspection that the TCA offers and discuss a number of practical aspects for a TCA application typical for the analysis of CERN LHC data. We conclude with a study to support the assumption that those properties of X most relevant for tasks of the complexity typical for a CERN LHC experiment, are usually caught by a TCA up to the second order.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

Builds on

5 of 44 references.

References · 5

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,223
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,360
  5. 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 660

Built on by

Not cited yet.