ChitraMiti: Benchmarking Visual Grounding and Modality Reliance in Bengali Geometric Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluation of vision-language models (VLMs) for multimodal mathematical reasoning remains limited for low-resource languages and for geometry problems that require reading a diagram and a question together. We introduce ChitraMiti-12.8k, a synthetic benchmark of 12,874 Bengali planar geometry problems paired with structured 15-attribute descriptions, and NCTB-500, a complementary set of 500 diagrams manually extracted from Bengali school textbooks. Using a three-phase protocol that separates diagram-only, diagram-plus-description, and description-only inputs, we show across five open-weight and closed-source VLMs that description-only performance is statistically indistinguishable from diagram-plus-description performance, establishing structured descriptions as a sufficient textual proxy for controlled evaluation. Despite this, models remain poor at cross-modal verification, frequently misled by a swapped spatial relation even when they answer the unmodified item correctly. We further evaluate supervised adaptation on ChitraMiti-12.8k, finding that fine-tuning improves performance on both ChitraMiti-1k and NCTB-500, although a substantial gap to the strongest zero-shot model remains. Together, ChitraMiti-12.8k, NCTB-500, and our evaluation protocol offer a standardized way to study Bengali multimodal geometry reasoning and, more broadly, whether VLMs actually check their text against what they see. Our dataset and code are publicly available on Hugging Face at https://huggingface.co/datasets/RaiyanKhaan/ChitraMiti.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.
Builds on
6 of 24 references.
References · 6
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
- 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
- 2021IconQA: A New Benchmark for Abstract Diagram Understanding and Visual Language Reasoningcited by 267
- 2026Gemma 4 Technical Reportcited by 259
- 2024Unraveling Cross-Modality Knowledge Conflicts in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 28
- 2026DeepVision-103K: A Visually Diverse, Broad-Coverage, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Multimodal Reasoningcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023GeomVerse: A Systematic Evaluation of Large Models for Geometric Reasoning
- 2025GanitBench: A bi-lingual benchmark for evaluating mathematical reasoning in Vision Language Models
- 2026From Symbolic Perception to Logical Deduction: A Framework for Guiding Language Models in Geometric Reasoning
- 2025Euclid's Gift: Enhancing Spatial Perception and Reasoning in Vision-Language Models via Geometric Surrogate Tasks
- 2025GeoBench: Rethinking Multimodal Geometric Problem-Solving via Hierarchical Evaluation
- 2025GeoThought: A Dataset for Enhancing Mathematical Geometry Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2025DynaSolidGeo: A Dynamic Benchmark for Genuine Spatial Mathematical Reasoning of VLMs in Solid Geometry
- 2026GeoChallenge: A Multi-Answer Multiple-Choice Benchmark for Geometric Reasoning with Diagrams