Confidence-Gated Transductive Test Generation for Code Reranking
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test case synthesis is crucial for evaluating and ranking programs generated by large language models (LLMs). However, constructing high-quality test cases remains challenging because reliable expected outputs are often difficult to obtain. We propose Confidence-Gated Transductive Test Generation (CoTT), which first uses an efficient inductive procedure and invokes transductive generation only when inductive confidence is low. This adaptive design improves output reliability while allocating extra computation only when needed. On code reranking benchmarks, CoTT outperforms prior baselines across the reported metrics while reducing cost relative to applying transductive generation to every input. These results show that confidence-based allocation of test-time computation provides a favorable efficiency-effectiveness trade-off with a single efficient LLM.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.
Builds on
15 of 28 references.
References · 15
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2022CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Testscited by 384
- 2023LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Executioncited by 239
- 2024Debug like a Human: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-stepcited by 127
- 2024Escape Sky-high Cost: Early-stopping Self-Consistency for Multi-step Reasoningcited by 108
- 2025S*: Test Time Scaling for Code Generationcited by 98
- 2025ACECODER: Acing Coder RL via Automated Test-Case Synthesiscited by 93
- 2025rStar-Coder: Scaling Competitive Code Reasoning with a Large-Scale Verified Datasetcited by 51
- 2025Dynamic Scaling of Unit Tests for Code Reward Modelingcited by 33
- 2024Reasoning Through Execution: Unifying Process and Outcome Rewards for Code Generationcited by 21
Built on by
Not cited yet.