mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Differentially Private Federated Proximal Optimization Framework for Customer Churn Prediction in Heterogeneous Federated Telecom Networks

arXiv 2609.12470 ↗First posted 11 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Customer churn is one of the major issues in the telecommunication industry. To predict customer churn, conventional centralized machine learning approaches have been widely used. This centralized approach requires customer data to be stored in a central repository, which raises privacy concerns and may violate data protection regulations. Federated learning addresses this problem by allowing multiple telecom operators to collaboratively train a global model without transferring their raw customer data. However, real-world customer data are often heterogeneous (non-IID), which may negatively affect the performance of standard federated learning. Trained models can also suffer from privacy attacks. To address those issues, we propose a Differentially Private (DP) based Federated Proximal optimization (FedProx) framework. All experiments were performed on two publicly available telecom churn datasets. We trained Federated Averaging (FedAvg), DP-FedAvg, FedProx, and the proposed DP-FedProx framework. For baseline comparison, we also used several centralized and local models. To evaluate the models, we employed seven widely used evaluation metrics. The experimental results show that the FedProx based models consistently outperform the FedAvg based models. Compared with the best centralized model, the proposed DP-FedProx framework achieves competitive prediction performance with only a small reduction in accuracy while providing privacy guarantees. To explain our model, we conducted SHAP analysis which shows that DP-FedProx method priorities revenue group features. These results indicate that the proposed DP-FedProx framework provides a practical balance between prediction performance and data privacy protection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.

Builds on

16 of 44 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  4. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
  5. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
  6. 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 408
  7. 2018Differentially Private Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 235
  8. 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
  9. 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 153
  10. 2021From Distributed Machine Learning to Federated Learning: A Surveycited by 66
  11. 2024Trustworthy Federated Learning: Privacy, Security, and Beyondcited by 11
  12. 2022Data transformation based optimized customer churn prediction model for the telecommunication industrycited by 6
4 more
  1. 2024Privacy-Preserving Customer Churn Prediction Model in the Context of Telecommunication Industrycited by 3
  2. 2025Shadow defense against gradient inversion attack in federated learningcited by 2
  3. 2024Enhancing Customer Churn Prediction in Telecommunications: An Adaptive Ensemble Learning Approachcited by 1
  4. 2026Class-Aware Adaptive Differential Privacy in Deep Learning for Sensor-Based Fall Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.