mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Space as an Interventional Invariant: Cross-Modal Predictive Geometry for Stratified Cities and Em-Spaced Intelligence

arXiv 2609.11959 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Space is a foundational concept across mathematics, physics, spatial cognition, urban science, and embodied intelligence, yet these fields often treat spatial structure either as a shared geometric container or as a collection of disconnected representations. Such approaches struggle to explain how heterogeneous sensory and urban processes can jointly reveal a common spatial structure, particularly when different modalities do not share the same metric or representation. This paper addresses this gap by defining space as an interventional invariant: the minimal relational structure that preserves local compatibility and the conditional laws of future observations under admissible actions. We develop a cross-modal predictive geometry that integrates local state spaces, modality-specific observation maps, an action groupoid, and a canonical predictive-state quotient, with explicit causal conditions for identifying interventional rather than merely observational structure. The key theoretical result shows that, under joint point separation, equivariance, and interventional faithfulness, the latent space is identifiable up to the centraliser of the intervention group, thereby reducing representational ambiguity to residual coordinate freedom. The framework is further extended to stratified urban systems using sheaf-valued representations, allowing geometric, physical, mobility, social, and economic layers to coexist without being reduced to a single metric. Synthetic experiments under noise evaluate equivariance, predictive sufficiency, holonomy, restriction-map recovery, cross-scale consistency, and context saturation. The resulting framework provides a unified and falsifiable foundation for spatial cognition, urban science, embodied AI, and em-spaced intelligence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2026.

Builds on

22 of 68 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,167
  2. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  3. 2017Poincar'e Embeddings for Learning Hierarchical Representationscited by 684
  4. 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
  5. 2020Learning Invariant Representations for Reinforcement Learning without Reconstructioncited by 436
  6. 2016Successor Features for Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 340
  7. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 312
  8. 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
  9. 2022Neural Sheaf Diffusion: A Topological Perspective on Heterophily and Oversmoothing in GNNscited by 214
  10. 2022Interventional Causal Representation Learningcited by 142
  11. 2022Weakly supervised causal representation learningcited by 140
  12. 2019Scalable methods for computing state similarity in deterministic Markov Decision Processescited by 133
10 more
  1. 2022CITRIS: Causal Identifiability from Temporal Intervened Sequencescited by 133
  2. 2020Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamicscited by 130
  3. 2023Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventionscited by 106
  4. 2019The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICAcited by 86
  5. 2019A synthetic approach to Markov kernels, conditional independence and theorems on sufficient statisticscited by 56
  6. 2025SITE: towards Spatial Intelligence Thorough Evaluationcited by 29
  7. 2024SPA: 3D Spatial-Awareness Enables Effective Embodied Representationcited by 28
  8. 2026ESI-Bench: Towards Embodied Spatial Intelligence that Closes the Perception-Action Loopcited by 26
  9. 2023Identifiable Feature Learning for Spatial Data with Nonlinear ICAcited by 4
  10. 2018Discovering space - Grounding spatial topology and metric regularity in a naive agent's sensorimotor experiencecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.