Pre- and Post-Treatment Brain Metastases Segmentation Using nnU-Net with Post-Processing for BraTS 2026
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Brain metastases exhibit high inter-lesion variability in size, enhancement pattern, and post-treatment appearance, making volumetric segmentation of both pre- and post-treatment cases the central challenge of the BraTS 2026 Task 1 (Brain Metastases). We build a pragmatic pipeline on a 5-fold nnU-Net ResEnc-L ensemble, in which each fold is trained independently for 1,000 epochs with the standard Dice + cross-entropy loss on 1,296 four-modality training cases. This ensemble is followed by a rule-based post-processing cascade tuned for the lesion-wise Dice similarity coefficient (LW-DSC), a detection-oriented metric that behaves very differently from the traditional global Dice. The final pipeline reaches an LW-DSC of 0.733 / 0.751 / 0.713 / 0.549 on the enhancing tumour (ET), tumour core (TC), whole tumour (WT), and resection cavity (RC) sub-regions on the official validation leaderboard. Rather than trusting these leaderboard gains, we audit every post-processing stage with a five-fold out-of-fold (OOF) analysis with no model-training leakage over all 1,296 training cases, scored with the official BraTS evaluation code (BraTS_evaluation): it confirms two stages as robust, per-fold-consistent improvements while the third improves only the leaderboard and does not reproduce out-of-fold. We further provide a mechanistic analysis of the LW-DSC metric that explains why recall-recovering post-processing carries low risk whereas component deletion does not, and we report thirteen negative results spanning loss engineering, alternative backbones, and inference-time settings, several of which run counter to widely held intuitions. Source code is released under Apache-2.0 at https://github.com/hornbeamliu/brats2026-met.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 28 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
- 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,476
- 2016Instance Normalization: The Missing Ingredient for Fast Stylizationcited by 1,198
- 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 518
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 240
- 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 195
- 2021MedPerf: Open Benchmarking Platform for Medical Artificial Intelligence using Federated Evaluationcited by 88
- 2024The 2024 Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge: Glioma Segmentation on Post-treatment MRIcited by 69
- 2023Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validationcited by 58
Built on by
Not cited yet.