mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mi-Ripple: Restoring Images Degraded by Iterative AI Editing

arXiv 2609.11317 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Iterative reference-conditioned image editing can introduce grid-like and granular textures, commonly described as digital ripple. We present Mi-Ripple, a diagnosis-guided restoration workflow that suppresses this digital ripple while protecting image structure. Mi-Ripple separates periodic lattice artifacts from content-entangled granular texture, then combines selective spectral notching, structure-aware smoothing, and cleaned-reference regeneration. This separation enables low-distortion filtering when artifacts are spectrally isolated and visual reconstruction when filtering would erase legitimate detail. Across fourteen notch-only executions, whole-image residual standard deviation is 0.08--0.44 in CIELAB lightness units. In a paired regeneration example, reference cleaning reduces output debris density by 45%. Mi-Ripple links measurable artifact reduction to visibly cleaner generated images, rather than optimizing a spectral score alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

6 of 12 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,184
  2. 2022On the detection of synthetic images generated by diffusion modelscited by 283
  3. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
  4. 2023Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MADcited by 250
  5. 2019Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Imagescited by 139
  6. 2026Banana100: Breaking NR-IQA Metrics by 100 Iterative Image Replications with Nano Banana Procited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.