mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When does a spectral prior help graph learning? Connectivity-loss estimation under road-network disruptions

arXiv 2609.11166 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid evaluation of many simultaneous road-link disruptions requires a practical compromise between exact spectral recomputation and local approximation. We estimate relative algebraic-connectivity loss after multi-edge deletion using graph neural networks (GNNs) that learn a bounded correction to a first-order Fiedler sensitivity. The study considers independent, spatially clustered, and edge-betweenness-targeted failures, with graph-disjoint synthetic splits and zero-shot transfer to 13 OpenStreetMap (OSM) areas in six countries. GCN, GraphSAGE, and edge-aware MPNN backbones are compared with analytical baselines. In expanded OSM tests, residual GCN improves spatial-failure MAE by 0.0391 (95% hierarchical interval 0.0151-0.0662), while residual GraphSAGE improves targeted-failure MAE by 0.0257 (0.0095-0.0446). Second-order perturbation improves first-order MAE by only 0.0028-0.0053. Correction slopes decrease under targeted transfer, indicating residual shrinkage around systematic prior error. Leave-one-country-out OSM-to-OSM transfer is mixed: residual GCN improves targeted-failure MAE by 0.0622 (0.0169-0.1153) but worsens the spatial point estimate. Sparse scaling extends to 20,000 nodes and separates one-time spectral setup from amortized screening cost. These results characterize the spectral residual as a useful but domain-sensitive inductive bias for structural connectivity screening. Code, cached networks, and reproducibility artifacts are archived at doi:10.5281/zenodo.22307723.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

9 of 34 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  5. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  6. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
  7. 2018Graph networks as learnable physics engines for inference and controlcited by 242
  8. 2016OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networkscited by 109
  9. 2024Resilient by Design: Simulating Street Network Disruptions across Every Urban Area in the Worldcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.