LILA: Calibration-Free Structured Pruning of Large Language Models via Latent Spectral Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Structured pruning of large language models (LLMs) offers hardware-efficient compression, yet existing methods require calibration data, gradient computation, or large auxiliary policy networks at pruning time. LILA (Latent-Informed Layer Analysis) scores neuron importance via the Kolmogorov--Smirnov (KS) distance between empirical singular value distributions of the full and neuron-ablated feed-forward network (FFN) weight matrix, providing a closed-form spectral rule requiring no training, calibration data, or auxiliary network. Without any fine-tuning, LILA surpasses PruneNet (45M-parameter RL policy) by 1.57~pp in zero-shot accuracy on LLaMA-2-7B at 25% sparsity, and outperforms WikiText-2-calibrated SliceGPT by up to 6.0~pp across all sparsity levels, while preserving the original architecture. After one epoch of LoRA recovery fine-tuning, LILA achieves highly competitive performance, matching the heavily calibrated SliceGPT baseline to within a 0.48~pp margin across LLaMA-2-7B and Phi-2, despite using zero calibration data. A Neural Tangent Kernel analysis confirms a 22× reduction in functional distortion versus random pruning, providing theoretical grounding for the spectral importance criterion. Finally, extending LILA to dynamically allocate sparsity budgets via KS-scores yields state-of-the-art generative preservation at moderate compression, while uncovering fundamental single-layer architectural bottlenecks at higher compression regimes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
19 of 30 references.
References · 19
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
7 more
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Need II: phi-1.5 technical reportcited by 565
- 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
- 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 383
- 2022Language model compression with weighted low-rank factorizationcited by 195
- 2023NTK-SAP: Improving neural network pruning by aligning training dynamicscited by 30
- 2025You Only Prune Once: Designing Calibration-Free Model Compression With Policy Learningcited by 17
- 2017Introduction to Nonnegative Matrix Factorizationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.