Contrastive Projection: Reading Transformer Internals by Differencing Logit Lenses
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reading a transformer's internal states in token space is easy to do and hard to trust: a logit lens on a single hidden state is dominated, at intermediate layers, by the generic tokens the model would predict for almost any input. We read the difference instead. Subtracting two closely matched prompts' hidden states and projecting through the unembedding cancels the shared component and surfaces what separates them, an operation equivalent to reading a RepE/ActAdd steering vector through a logit lens. Built into a training-free tracer that reads at every position, sub-layer, and head and averages over designed baselines, it traces a compound- noun MLP->attention chain in Phi-2, confirmed there by activation patching, with the same distinction recovered across three architectures by readout and probe rather than by patching; it reads what retrieval surfaces for real versus fictional entities, and reads metaphor as a set of domain-to-domain mappings rather than a single figurativity feature. A cross-seed control marks the boundary: across five networks differing only in initialization, the same distinction surfaces as almost entirely different tokens (top-10 overlap 0.08). What a computation looks like in token space is network-specific; the distinction it draws is not
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,239
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 700
- 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 579
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 512
- 2023Function Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 292
- 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 190
8 more
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 175
- 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computationscited by 145
- 2023Future Lens: Anticipating Subsequent Tokens from a Single Hidden Statecited by 116
- 2023Successor Heads: Recurring, Interpretable Attention Heads In The Wildcited by 77
- 2023Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patchingcited by 75
- 2026The Spike, the Sparse and the Sink: Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention Sinkscited by 23
- 2026From Latent Signals to Reflection Behavior: Tracing Meta-Cognitive Activation Trajectory in R1-Style LLMscited by 2
- 2026CoRect: Context-Aware Logit Contrast for Hidden State Rectification to Resolve Knowledge Conflictscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.