mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Teacher Geometry Shapes Learnability in Teacher-Student Networks

arXiv 2609.09595 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Teacher-student systems, in which a teacher neural network generates training labels so that a student neural network can learn to implement the same function, are widely used as an abstract setting to study learning. However, the structure of the teachers is often overlooked by assuming randomly-generated, normally-distributed parameters. This hides substantial variation in how learnable different teachers are. We formalize learnability as the success rate of converging to the global minimum, as a function of overparameterization, learning algorithm, student initialization distribution, and teacher geometry. We both identify an easy distribution that maximizes node dissimilarity and a hard distribution that minimizes it, and show that these two distributions induce markedly different success rates across a large range of settings and for different activation functions. To explain the gap, we study the loss landscape of small neural networks that contain two distinct kinds of suboptimal local minima, out-of-bounds (OOB) minima at the edge of the data distribution and interior minima within. Assuming infinite data and a fast readout layer, we analytically reduce the loss landscape of small networks to two dimensions, showing that the region of attraction of interior minima changes as a function of teacher structure. In larger networks, maximally dissimilar teachers induce more interior minima, while minimally dissimilar teachers induce more OOB minima. Motivated by these analyses, we show that differentially increasing the learning rate of the readout layer and decreasing the learning rate of the inner biases increases success rates. These findings provide an important step in narrowing the gap between the study of teacher-student networks and more structured functions that arise in practice.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

Builds on

42 of 56 references.

References · 42

  1. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  3. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,216
  4. 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
  5. 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 378
  6. 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 253
  7. 2017High-dimensional dynamics of generalization error in neural networkscited by 238
  8. 2020Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningcited by 237
  9. 2018Implicit Self-Regularization in Deep Neural Networks: Evidence from Random Matrix Theory and Implications for Learningcited by 211
  10. 2022Hidden Progress in Deep Learning: SGD Learns Parities Near the Computational Limitcited by 184
  11. 2017Bounding and Counting Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 161
  12. 2022The merged-staircase property: a necessary and nearly sufficient condition for SGD learning of sparse functions on two-layer neural networkscited by 141
30 more
  1. 2021Geometry of the Loss Landscape in Overparameterized Neural Networks: Symmetries and Invariancescited by 125
  2. 2020Online stochastic gradient descent on non-convex losses from high-dimensional inferencecited by 119
  3. 2020The Gaussian equivalence of generative models for learning with shallow neural networkscited by 113
  4. 2019Dynamics of stochastic gradient descent for two-layer neural networks in the teacher-student setupcited by 112
  5. 2017Spurious Local Minima are Common in Two-Layer ReLU Neural Networkscited by 104
  6. 2020Neural Networks Fail to Learn Periodic Functions and How to Fix Itcited by 97
  7. 2013On the number of response regions of deep feed forward networks with piece-wise linear activationscited by 94
  8. 2017Failures of Gradient-Based Deep Learningcited by 79
  9. 2020Learning Parities with Neural Networkscited by 77
  10. 2022Gradient flow dynamics of shallow ReLU networks for square loss and orthogonal inputscited by 74
  11. 2021The staircase property: How hierarchical structure can guide deep learningcited by 62
  12. 2018The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural networkcited by 58
  13. 2023Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 54
  14. 2017An Analytical Formula of Population Gradient for two-layered ReLU network and its Applications in Convergence and Critical Point Analysiscited by 52
  15. 2020Optimization and Generalization of Shallow Neural Networks with Quadratic Activation Functionscited by 50
  16. 2023Leveraging the two timescale regime to demonstrate convergence of neural networkscited by 18
  17. 2023Expand-and-Cluster: Parameter Recovery of Neural Networkscited by 15
  18. 2023Fundamental limits of overparametrized shallow neural networks for supervised learningcited by 12
  19. 2024Simplicity bias and optimization threshold in two-layer ReLU networkscited by 11
  20. 2018On the choice of metric in gradient-based theories of brain functioncited by 8
  21. 2019Luck Matters: Understanding Training Dynamics of Deep ReLU Networkscited by 8
  22. 2023Should Under-parameterized Student Networks Copy or Average Teacher Weights?cited by 8
  23. 2025Hardness of Learning Fixed Parities with Neural Networkscited by 7
  24. 2022Magnitude and Angle Dynamics in Training Single ReLU Neuronscited by 5
  25. 2023MLPGradientFlow: going with the flow of multilayer perceptrons (and finding minima fast and accurately)cited by 3
  26. 2025Flat Channels to Infinity in Neural Loss Landscapescited by 3
  27. 2025Closed-Form Last Layer Optimizationcited by 3
  28. 2025Linearity-based neural network compressioncited by 1
  29. 2026It's Not a Lottery, It's a Race: Understanding How Gradient Descent Adapts the Network's Capacity to the Taskcited by 1
  30. 2026Rethinking Neural Network Learning Rates: A Stackelberg Perspectivecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.