mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Vibe Shift in Software Engineering: Evaluating AI-Led Conversational Programming for Performance, Cognition, and Responsible Adoption

arXiv 2609.09560 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.ETcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study evaluates Vibe Coding, an emerging AI-led conversational programming paradigm that enables developers to generate software through natural-language interaction with large language models. Using a mixed-methods design, the study assessed performance efficiency, cognitive implications, and responsible adoption in comparison with traditional and AI-assisted coding environments. Thirty participants, including professional developers and advanced computing students, completed equivalent programming tasks under three experimental conditions. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and repeated-measures ANOVA, while qualitative data were examined through thematic analysis. Results show that vibe coding significantly improved development efficiency, reducing task completion time by 27% compared with traditional coding and 12% compared with AI-assisted coding. However, these gains were accompanied by lower maintainability indices and higher security vulnerabilities, indicating trade-offs in software quality. Usability results yielded a good rating (SUS = 71.4), while cognitive workload remained moderate (NASA-TLX = 55.5), reflecting reduced syntactic effort but increased linguistic reasoning. Thematic analysis identified trust calibration, loss of control, cognitive adaptation, and prompt-engineering strategy as key constructs. Notably, perceived loss of control was associated with increased security risks due to reduced transparency and validation of AI-generated outputs. Based on these findings, the study proposes a three-pillar framework for responsible adoption: hybrid integration of human and AI capabilities, human oversight and transparent accountability, and context-aware deployment. Overall, vibe coding enhances productivity but requires critical oversight, reinforcing its role as a transformative yet transitional paradigm in software development.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 62 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code Contributionscited by 417
  2. 2023Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 237
  3. 2023Large Language Models for Code: Security Hardening and Adversarial Testingcited by 149
  4. 2022Programming Is Hard -- Or at Least It Used to Be: Educational Opportunities And Challenges of AI Code Generationcited by 97
  5. 2023A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challengescited by 75
  6. 2025Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AIcited by 39
  7. 2024A Systematic Literature Review on Large Language Models for Automated Program Repaircited by 37
  8. 2024Automatic Programming: Large Language Models and Beyondcited by 35
  9. 2023Vulnerabilities in AI Code Generators: Exploring Targeted Data Poisoning Attackscited by 29
  10. 2025Vibe coding: programming through conversation with artificial intelligencecited by 26
  11. 2023ChatGPT: More than a Weapon of Mass Deception, Ethical challenges and responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) perspectivecited by 22
  12. 2024Artificial-Intelligence Generated Code Considered Harmful: A Road Map for Secure and High-Quality Code Generationcited by 11
9 more
  1. 2024DeVAIC: A Tool for Security Assessment of AI-generated Codecited by 8
  2. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Driven Advancements and Techniques in Automated Program Repair and Code Generationcited by 7
  3. 2024"It's like a rubber duck that talks back": Understanding Generative AI-Assisted Data Analysis Workflows through a Participatory Prompting Studycited by 6
  4. 2025Security Vulnerabilities in AI-Generated Code: A Large-Scale Analysis of Public GitHub Repositoriescited by 5
  5. 2021What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?cited by 4
  6. 2025A Qualitative Study of User Perception of M365 AI Copilotcited by 2
  7. 2025Prompt Programming: A Platform for Dialogue-based Computational Problem Solving with Generative AI Modelscited by 1
  8. 2025Future of Code with Generative AI: Transparency and Safety in the Era of AI Generated Softwarecited by 1
  9. 2025Foundational Design Principles and Patterns for Building Robust and Adaptive GenAI-Native Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.