Adaptive Entangled Game Modules in Artificial General Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce a probability-wave framework for modeling the collective behavior of interacting adaptive agents, deriving testable eigenmodes through a generalized behavioral intelligence (GBI) nonlocal probability-wave equation. This framework captures a broad range of human intelligence behaviors with analytical mechanisms and offers an indirect method to examine the Liu-Chen-Ao (LCA) hypothesis of nonlocal entangled nerve fibers in the brain through collective trader behaviors. Our empirical analysis of Chinese intraday stock market data demonstrates that adaptive entangled game modes explain 82-94% (89% overall) of observed decision patterns, a sharp contrast to the predictions of neoclassical finance based on independent rational agents. Moreover, 2-12% of behaviors show adaption to intraday news, events, and environments, characterized by dual equilibrium states and abrupt reference point shifts, while purely independent modes occur in less than 5% of cases. These findings empirically support the LCA hypothesis, as observable trading behaviors reflect underlying brain mechanisms and internal intelligence decision-making in behavioral psychology. Our results highlight the necessity of incorporating adaptive entangled game modules into artificial general intelligence (AGI) architectures, addressing the limitations of conventional artificial neural network (ANN)-based AI, which relies on trillions of opaque parameters. By integrating ANN-based AI with probability-wave-based entangled-brain simulations, machine learning can enrich AGI foundation models (FMs) and facilitate the development of human-like processing units (HPUs) that leverage brain-inspired mechanisms. Such HPUs may ultimately create more compact, efficient, and robust AGI systems, particularly for embodied intelligence and robotics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
11 of 74 references.
References · 11
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
- 2021Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolutioncited by 163
- 2016Quantum-enhanced machine learningcited by 79
- 2025Agentic Exploration of Physics Modelscited by 6
- 2017Control of Dynamics in Brain Networkscited by 4
- 2023Toward parallel intelligence: an interdisciplinary solution for complex systemscited by 2
- 2024Sparse learning enabled by constraints on connectivity and functioncited by 1
- 2025A ghost mechanism: An analytical model of abrupt learning in recurrent networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.