mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data-Efficient Crosswalk Segmentation from Overhead CCTV via Confidence- and Geometry-Guided Pseudo-Labeling

arXiv 2609.08914 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pixel-level annotation of fixed traffic-camera imagery is expensive, while crosswalk models trained from street-level imagery face a substantial viewpoint and appearance shift when applied to elevated CCTV. We investigate a data-efficient target-domain pipeline using 241 manually annotated CCTV images and 5,926 unlabeled CCTV frames. A source-domain experiment trains a 31.0M-parameter custom U-Net on 3,300 first-person-view (FPV) images and obtains 93.05% IoU on its 330-image FPV test split. This result is a source baseline, not transferred performance: the released CCTV notebook instantiates a 42.0M-parameter DeepLabV3-ResNet50 from torchvision weights, and no compatible mapping from the U-Net checkpoint is implemented. Training on 201 manual CCTV images and selecting on 40 held-out manual masks yields 88.91% IoU. The model then predicts all unlabeled frames; image-level certainty and a largest-component area prior rank the candidates, and the top 1,000 attain mean certainty 0.976 and mean combined score 0.988. A repository audit shows that the reported second-stage 98.52% IoU was measured on a 150-image split containing only teacher-generated pseudo-masks. Because of a directory-layout mismatch, the executed combined-data loader found zero manual samples and split 1,000 pseudo-labeled samples into 850 training and 150 evaluation samples. We therefore report 98.52% as internal pseudo-label agreement rather than human-ground-truth accuracy. The defensible target-domain result is 88.91% IoU on the 40 manual validation images. Batch-one FP32 inference at 512 x 512 requires 12.98 ms, corresponding to 77.03 FPS, on an NVIDIA RTX A6000 48 GB GPU. These findings support the practicality of confidence-and-geometry filtering while also showing why pseudo-label evaluation must remain isolated from the labels used for self-training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 19 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  4. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  5. 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,082
  6. 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
  7. 2021Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Cross Pseudo Supervisioncited by 463
  8. 2020DACS: Domain Adaptation via Cross-domain Mixed Samplingcited by 226
  9. 2021ST++: Make Self-training Work Better for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 184
  10. 2018Automatic Large-Scale Data Acquisition via Crowdsourcing for Crosswalk Classification: A Deep Learning Approachcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.