MRI-Guided Reslice-Refined Cross-Slice SDF Reconstruction of the Left Ventricle from Cardiac MRI with Sparse Axial Supervision
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reconstructing a three-dimensional left-ventricular (LV) endocardial surface from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) data is challenging when supervision is available on only a small number of axial slices. Through-plane geometry is weakly constrained, and automatically generated two-dimensional masks can propagate segmentation errors into the recovered shape. We present MR-RS-SDFR, a per-case implicit signed distance field (SDF) framework that reconstructs a continuous LV surface from a CMR volume and sparse axial weak masks. The method first builds a cross-slice SDF initialization from axial and longitudinal geometric cues and then refines the field using two complementary signals: MRI edge-field normal alignment, which provides an image-derived boundary cue independent of the weak masks, and differentiable reslice Dice and contour consistency, which preserve agreement with the observed planes. We evaluate three weak-mask generators -- LOO TransUNet, LOO nnU-Net, and an off-the-shelf Medical SAM3 model used without MM-WHS-specific training or fine-tuning -- and five sparsity levels from 4 to 64 axial planes. In the sparse-16 setting, final MR-RS-SDFR reconstruction reaches 0.928 Dice and 3.80mm HD95 with Medical SAM3 masks. The upstream generators do not exhibit a single common ranking across 2D and dense 3D segmentation, and nnU-Net- and Medical-SAM3-driven sparse reconstruction achieve the same mean final Dice despite different upstream error profiles. Across all three sparse-16 mask sources, MR-RS-SDFR is numerically better than protocol-matched full GHD+DVS in both Dice and HD95. Final Dice improves markedly from sparse-4 to sparse-16 and then saturates at the reported precision through sparse-64. These results support MRI-guided per-case SDF refinement as a reconstruction strategy that remains effective across weak-mask generators and supervision densities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
- 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,712
- 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,558
- 2020Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapescited by 710
- 2019Evaluation of Algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An Open-Access Grand Challengecited by 100
- 2023NISF: Neural Implicit Segmentation Functionscited by 29
- 2026Medical SAM3: A Foundation Model for Universal Prompt-Driven Medical Image Segmentationcited by 25
- 2023Multi-view Hybrid Graph Convolutional Network for Volume-to-mesh Reconstruction in Cardiovascular MRIcited by 12
- 2024Explicit Differentiable Slicing and Global Deformation for Cardiac Mesh Reconstructioncited by 8
- 2025End-to-End 4D Heart Mesh Recovery Across Full-Stack and Sparse Cardiac MRIcited by 6
5 more
- 2024MedTet: An Online Motion Model for 4D Heart Reconstructioncited by 5
- 2025Neural Implicit Heart Coordinates: 3D cardiac shape reconstruction from sparse segmentationscited by 4
- 2026S2MDF: A Plug-And-Play Layer for Intersection-Free Multi-Object Signed Distance Fieldscited by 1
- 2026Transformer-Guided Graph Attention for Direct Cardiac Mesh Reconstruction: A Structural Digital Twin Frameworkcited by 1
- 2026NISF++: Geometrically-grounded implicit representations of 3D+time cardiac function from 2D short- and long-axis MR viewscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.