mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Digital Inventory of Cultural Heritage & Traditional Knowledge: Case for Indonesian Open Digital Library of Culture

arXiv 2609.08105 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.DL cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Indonesian Digital Library of Culture (Perpustakaan Digital Budaya Indonesia, PDBI; budaya-indonesia.org) is a participatory platform that has collected tens of thousands of entries on Nusantara cultural heritage through public contribution since 2007. Manual contribution faces three structural barriers: coverage (knowledge is scattered across languages and sites), integrity (open sources mix authentic documentation with noise), and completeness (subjects are recorded but their data remain shallow). This paper presents a methodological framework for autonomous, AI-based harvesting of cultural knowledge from the open web, designed to expand corpus coverage while intensifying per-entry data depth. The methodology is organised as a five-stage economic funnel: focused crawling, multilingual extraction and canonicalisation, vector encoding with blocking, agentic decision-making, and idempotent publication, under the principle of deterministic orchestration, agentic decisions. Each stage is formalised: funnel economics and optimal filter ordering; crawl-frontier dynamics as a subcritical branching process that explains the necessity of recurrent re-seeding; fact-level novelty via a containment measure; Bayesian multi-source evidence fusion with elevated publication thresholds for sacred categories; exactly-once effects via idempotent upserts and the transactional outbox; sliding-window inference budgeting with a reservation protocol; statistical quality auditing; and seed selection as submodular coverage maximisation. The framework retains four high-value human roles: curator of direction, escalation approver, quality auditor, and guardian of meaning, while machine autonomy is raised in stages. Ethical, legal, and cultural-sensitivity implications are discussed, including the architectural guarantee that the machine never overwrites human contributions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.

Builds on

4 of 28 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 861
  4. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 469

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026CultureBot: A Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Exploration of Cultural Heritage Data
  2. 2026Injecting Knowledge from Social Science Journals to Improve Indonesian Cultural Understanding by LLMs
  3. 2026Co-creation of AI technology, empowering curators of cultural heritage information and guarding research commons
  4. 2025Time Travel: A Comprehensive Benchmark to Evaluate LMMs on Historical and Cultural Artifacts
  5. 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4
  6. 2026Multimodal Cultural Heritage Knowledge Graph Extension with Language and Vision Models
  7. 2026AmalthAI: An Open-Source Computer Vision Platform for Cultural Heritage
  8. 2024Crossroads of Continents: Automated Artifact Extraction for Cultural Adaptation with Large Multimodal Models