Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know II? A Fully Behavioral, Non-Cognitive Measure of Epistemic Honesty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are frequently confident, eloquent, and well versed. A natural question arises: do they know what they don't know? To answer this question, we borrow the concept of epistemic honesty and develop a novel metric to systematically evaluate whether an LLM appropriately acknowledges the boundaries of its knowledge. In this work, we introduce the Epistemic Honesty Quotient (EHQ), which reports three observable sub-scores across two operational axes (epistemic restraint and substantive-answer calibration), and construct EHQ-3000, a 3,000-question benchmark spanning Fabricated Entity, Post-Cutoff Event, Hyper-Niche True, and Context-Conditioned Questions. From a frozen registry of 21 model API routes, 15 completed the protocol after endpoint and eligibility checks; 14 entered the confirmatory analysis because severe provider-side truncation made one route's score indeterminate. The study reveals substantial variation across models, including a difference that can not be explained by their capability to extract explicitly available information. Composite EHQ ranges from 0.31 to 0.81 across the analysed panel, despite near-ceiling performance on the document-grounded capability probe. The two restraint criteria overlap strongly under the present category composition, whereas substantive-answer calibration varies across models and does not reliably co-vary with restraint; however, the small panel leaves substantial uncertainty. Thus, EHQ reveals behavioral differences that are not visible to conventional correctness-based assessment, while also showing why dataset composition, provider behavior, and confidence elicitation must remain part of the interpretation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 32 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,856
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 974
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
13 more
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418
- 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 326
- 2023Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know?cited by 243
- 2025Why Language Models Hallucinatecited by 220
- 2024Don't Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 180
- 2023Alignment for Honestycited by 74
- 2023Knowledge of Knowledge: Exploring Known-Unknowns Uncertainty with Large Language Modelscited by 61
- 2024Can AI Assistants Know What They Don't Know?cited by 50
- 2025The Confidence Paradox: Can LLM Know When It's Wrongcited by 11
- 2025The Epistemic Suite: A Post-Foundational Diagnostic Methodology for Assessing AI Knowledge Claimscited by 2
- 2025The Polite Liar: Epistemic Pathology in Language Modelscited by 2
- 2026Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Frameworkcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.