Validating DBpedia Triple Sets for Natural Language Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a study of the quality of individual DBpedia triples from the perspective of Natural Language Generation, and propose and evaluate an approach for collecting entity-specific triple sets that filters out questionable triples while minimizing the loss of correct ones. We show in an evaluation against manually annotated data that with validation rules, it is possible to reach 98% precision in triple selection, and with improvements to a few Property definitions, it is possible to improve recall by 40% without harming precision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
0 of 17 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.