No-Regret Mixing of LRU and LFU with Optimal Switching Cost
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Caching systems often rely on simple eviction policies such as Least Recently Used (LRU) and Least Frequently Used (LFU), which perform well in complementary request regimes. Recent policies such as LeCar and Cacheus combine LRU and LFU using ideas from the experts problem in online learning. Specifically, upon a miss, they randomize between the two eviction rules using probabilities derived from scores updated by tracking the history of past evictions. While these policies exhibit strong empirical performance, it remains unclear whether they are guaranteed, on every request sequence, to perform asymptotically as well as the better of LRU and LFU, i.e., whether they achieve sublinear regret with respect to this benchmark. We first show that LeCar suffers linear regret against an oblivious adversary, even with unbounded history. We then propose H-MC, a Hedge-based mixture of virtual LRU and LFU caches that preserves Hedge's selection probabilities, and hence its regret guarantees, while minimizing the switching cost among all joint selection rules with these marginals.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
4 of 16 references.
References · 4
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2013Temporal Locality in Today's Content Caching: Why it Matters and How to Model itcited by 13
- 2013Prediction by Random-Walk Perturbationcited by 7
- 2025Efficient and Optimal No-Regret Caching under Partial Observationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.