Merging Cyber Threat Intelligence Through Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Small Language Models for Rich Threat Representation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern cybersecurity operations rely on CTI collected from heterogeneous sources, including semi-structured threat representations, IoCs, and narrative technical reports. However, these artifacts are often insufficient in isolation to reconstruct how an attack unfolds, under which conditions each step is feasible, and which traces it leaves behind. In practice, analysts must manually correlate partial evidence scattered across multiple and only partially structured sources, delaying the design of effective prevention, detection, and response actions. To address this gap, we propose an automated pipeline that derives an actionable representation of a cyberattack from heterogeneous CTI sources. The pipeline combines a RAG architecture with a locally deployable SLM, used to consolidate such evidence and infer missing operational details. Starting from a semi-structured threat representation and auxiliary CTI documents, the pipeline produces an enriched Attack Graph that captures a coarse, tactic-aligned progression of the attack and annotates each step with explicit pre-conditions and post-conditions, and an enriched description. This representation supports prevention by exposing execution requirements, detection by highlighting observable traces, and response by clarifying the temporal progression of the attack. Then, due to the lack of validated datasets with ground-truth information on the temporal evolution of real-world attacks, we test the complete pipeline on 10 real-world case studies spanning multiple threat types, including backdoors and staged downloaders delivered via phishing. A manual assessment across 10 real-world case studies provides initial evidence that the generated graphs are consistent with expected attack progressions, indicating that the proposed approach can support analysts by consolidating dispersed CTI evidence into a structured and actionable view of attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 7
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
- 2025Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AIcited by 254
- 2020Embedding-based Retrieval in Facebook Searchcited by 155
- 2024Understanding the Performance and Estimating the Cost of LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 48
- 2025LRCTI: A Large Language Model-Based Framework for Multi-Step Evidence Retrieval and Reasoning in Cyber Threat Intelligence Credibility Verificationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond RAG for Cyber Threat Intelligence: A Systematic Evaluation of Graph-Based and Agentic Retrieval
- 2025CTIConnect: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs over Heterogeneous Cyber Threat Intelligence
- 2025Advancing Autonomous Incident Response: Leveraging LLMs and Cyber Threat Intelligence
- 2026CTIFoundry: An Agent-Native Corpus Scaffold for Cyber Threat Intelligence
- 2026Hierarchical Retrieval Augmented Generation for Adversarial Technique Annotation in Cyber Threat Intelligence Text
- 2026Retrieval-Constrained Policy Optimization for Attack Technique Extraction from Cyber Threat Intelligence
- 2025Adapting Large Language Models to Emerging Cybersecurity using Retrieval Augmented Generation
- 2025From Retrieval to Reasoning: A Framework for Cyber Threat Intelligence NER with Explicit and Adaptive Instructions