mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FedRAW: Preserving Rare-Label Influence in Asynchronous Federated Learning

arXiv 2609.07192 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Asynchronous federated learning improves scalability by updating the global model from a server-side buffer of client updates as they arrive, rather than waiting for all selected clients to finish. While efficient, this arrival-driven aggregation can silently distort representation learning under heterogeneous participation. We identify silent rarity failure, a hidden failure mode in which clients holding rare labels contribute too weakly to the global model even though its overall accuracy appears largely unaffected. This failure arises from two coupled effects: rare-label clients may submit updates less frequently when they are slower or less available, creating participation bias; and once their updates enter the buffer, standard asynchronous aggregation assigns them no compensating influence, creating aggregation bias. We propose FedRAW, a fully server-side aggregation method that preserves rare-label influence without changing local training, client objectives, or communication protocols. FedRAW combines client-level update deduplication, which prevents frequently arriving clients from repeatedly dominating the update buffer, with rare-label-aware weighting, which increases the influence of clients carrying low-coverage labels. We formalize silent rarity failure through participation and aggregation bias, and show that FedRAW increases rare-label client influence over uniform aggregation while preserving convergence. Across EMNIST Balanced, CIFAR-10, HAM10000, and ISIC-2019, FedRAW improves rarelabel accuracy while preserving comparable global accuracy and adding negligible server-side computation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

13 of 21 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
  4. 2019Fair Resource Allocation in Federated Learningcited by 389
  5. 2020A Patient-Centric Dataset of Images and Metadata for Identifying Melanomas Using Clinical Contextcited by 146
  6. 2021FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learningcited by 114
  7. 2022Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary Detectioncited by 83
  8. 2019Astraea: Self-balancing Federated Learning for Improving Classification Accuracy of Mobile Deep Learning Applicationscited by 64
  9. 2022Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-Tailed Data via Classifier Re-Training with Federated Featurescited by 63
  10. 2024FedFa: A Fully Asynchronous Training Paradigm for Federated Learningcited by 12
  11. 2021FedSLD: Federated Learning with Shared Label Distribution for Medical Image Classificationcited by 10
  12. 2025SyncFed: Time-Aware Federated Learning through Explicit Timestamping and Synchronizationcited by 4
1 more
  1. 2025AFBS:Buffer Gradient Selection in Semi-asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.