mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-grained Distributed Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning

arXiv 2609.07147 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning, as a privacy-preserving distributed machine learning paradigm, faces significant threats from backdoor attacks. Compared to centralized attacks, distributed backdoor attacks are more harmful but require more poisoned samples to compensate for the loss of trigger strength due to decomposition. Fixed trigger patterns are also easily detected by robust aggregation algorithms, increasing the risk of attack exposure. To address these challenges, we propose a fine-grained distributed backdoor attack framework (FDBA). This framework uses dynamic trigger generation and embedding vector optimization to perform attacks with fewer poisoned samples. First, we design a dynamic trigger generation method based on image edge structures using the Canny algorithm to extract edge features, which are then injected with Laplacian noise. RGB channel decomposition is applied for covert adaptation of the distributed trigger, reducing detection chances. Second, we introduce an embedding vector contrastive learning strategy that forces poisoned samples to approach the target class center in the feature space, enhancing attack effectiveness. On CIFAR-10, piecewise-linear estimates for target ASRs between 70% and 90% show that FDBA reduces the required poisoning ratio by 37.4%--48.4% compared with DBA. In non-independent and identically distributed (Non-IID) scenarios, FDBA retains 84.7% of its IID attack performance under extreme heterogeneity, whereas DBA drops to 73.5%, and the framework successfully bypasses mainstream defense mechanisms. This study offers new insights into federated learning security and emphasizes the potential threats and defense challenges posed by fine-grained distributed attacks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

22 of 38 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  2. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  3. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  4. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  5. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  6. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
  7. 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
  8. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
  9. 2018Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lenscited by 346
  10. 2021Adversarial Neuron Pruning Purifies Backdoored Deep Modelscited by 230
  11. 2019Detecting AI Trojans Using Meta Neural Analysiscited by 192
  12. 2020Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defensescited by 171
10 more
  1. 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 158
  2. 2022Neurotoxin: Durable Backdoors in Federated Learningcited by 97
  3. 2020Trojaning Language Models for Fun and Profitcited by 80
  4. 2022DeepSight: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning Through Deep Model Inspectioncited by 78
  5. 2020Rethinking the Trigger of Backdoor Attackcited by 76
  6. 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
  7. 2020Data Poisoning Attacks on Federated Machine Learningcited by 58
  8. 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 53
  9. 2022FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attackscited by 29
  10. 2020Backdoor Attacks on Federated Meta-Learningcited by 14

Built on by

Not cited yet.