mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trust-But-Verify: Poisoning-Resilient Locally Private Graph Learning Protocols

arXiv 2609.07063 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Membership inference attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Built upon local differential privacy (LDP), locally private graph learning protocols have emerged as an important paradigm for decentralized graph learning, balancing privacy protection and learning utility. Under such protocols, each user locally perturbs their node features and adjacency information before transmission, ensuring formal privacy guarantees without original data leaving the device. However, the inherently open participation nature renders these protocols critically vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, where adversaries inject carefully crafted malicious nodes to corrupt neighborhood aggregation and degrade downstream utility. Despite the severity of this threat, effective defenses in this setting remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose VERITAS, a poisoning-resilient locally private graph learning protocol built on a trust-but-verify paradigm. By introducing a verification list encoding graded peer trust levels, VERITAS jointly privatizes node features and graph structure on the user side, while exploiting bilateral attestation asymmetry on the server side to identify and prune malicious nodes. Concretely, VERITAS comprises four synergistic stages: (1) local data perturbation, (2) attestation-driven malicious node pruning, (3) utility restoration via dual denoising, and (4) robust private graph learning. Extensive experiments on four real-world benchmark datasets across multiple LDP mechanisms and GNN architectures demonstrate that VERITAS effectively defends against data poisoning attacks and significantly improves downstream graph learning utility under rigorous privacy guarantees.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Membership inference attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 27 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

27 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Devil's Hand: Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Private Graph Learning Protocols11 Jun

Other references · 26

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,906
  5. 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
  6. 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
  7. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
  8. 2020GNNGuard: Defending Graph Neural Networks against Adversarial Attackscited by 195
  9. 2018Adversarial Attack and Defense on Graph Data: A Surveycited by 166
  10. 2020Graph Clustering with Graph Neural Networkscited by 163
  11. 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
  12. 2020Characteristic Functions on Graphs: Birds of a Feather, from Statistical Descriptors to Parametric Modelscited by 116
14 more
  1. 2020Towards More Practical Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networkscited by 76
  2. 2021LinkTeller: Recovering Private Edges from Graph Neural Networks via Influence Analysiscited by 65
  3. 2022A Survey of Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommender Systemscited by 65
  4. 2020Locally Private Graph Neural Networkscited by 64
  5. 2016Discrete Distribution Estimation under Local Privacycited by 58
  6. 2019Transferring Robustness for Graph Neural Network Against Poisoning Attackscited by 58
  7. 2019Collecting and Analyzing Multidimensional Data with Local Differential Privacycited by 46
  8. 2017Adaptive Laplace Mechanism: Differential Privacy Preservation in Deep Learningcited by 34
  9. 2022Group Property Inference Attacks Against Graph Neural Networkscited by 21
  10. 2022Towards Private Learning on Decentralized Graphs with Local Differential Privacycited by 16
  11. 2019Estimating Numerical Distributions under Local Differential Privacycited by 14
  12. 2022Degree-Preserving Randomized Response for Graph Neural Networks under Local Differential Privacycited by 7
  13. 2023Blink: Link Local Differential Privacy in Graph Neural Networks via Bayesian Estimationcited by 6
  14. 2023Privacy-Preserving Graph Embedding based on Local Differential Privacycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.