mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MEMOBench: A Process Level Memory Benchmark for Robotic Manipulation

arXiv 2609.07047 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Vision-language-action models → Reasoning and chain-of-thought in VLA

Abstract (arXiv)

Robotic manipulation often requires acting on information that is no longer visible, yet Vision-Language-Action policies are usually evaluated when the current observation largely determines the next action. Existing robotic memory benchmarks expose this gap, but they still rely mainly on final task success and therefore conflate forgetting with manipulation failure. We present MEMOBench, a benchmark for process level memory evaluation in robotic manipulation. MEMOBench includes 30 history dependent tasks, 1,500 expert demonstrations, and 4,200 executable checkpoint instances from 84 templates. Each checkpoint pairs coarse to fine language with a simulator predicate and labels one memory operation: Storage, Update, or Compression. These annotations define Memory Storage Rate, Memory Update Rate, and Memory Compression Rate, which measure memory fidelity alongside task success. Across standard and memory augmented VLA policies, the strongest memory module baseline reaches only 31.9% average success rate, and high storage often coexists with weak update and compression. Checkpoint language also supervises semantic, contrastive, and framewise memory alignment objectives, yielding modest gains across different memory operations. MEMOBench provides a diagnostic evaluation suite and training supervision for memory grounded robotic policies. The project page is available at https://github.com/Collab-Gen/MEMOBench.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning and chain-of-thought in VLA, one of 13 directions in Vision-language-action models. Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026RoboMME: Benchmarking and Understanding Memory for Robotic Generalist Policies4 Mar
  2. 2025Rethinking Progression of Memory State in Robotic Manipulation: An Object-Centric Perspective14 Nov
  3. 2025MemoryVLA: Perceptual-Cognitive Memory in Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation26 Aug

Other references · 11

  1. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  2. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
  3. 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,338
  4. 2025Fine-Tuning Vision-Language-Action Models: Optimizing Speed and Successcited by 844
  5. 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 669
  6. 2021CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Taskscited by 564
  7. 2025MemER: Scaling Up Memory for Robot Control via Experience Retrievalcited by 64
  8. 2025SAM2Act: Integrating Visual Foundation Model with A Memory Architecture for Robotic Manipulationcited by 58
  9. 2026RMBench: Memory-Dependent Robotic Manipulation Benchmark with Insights into Policy Designcited by 40
  10. 2025Memory, Benchmark & Robots: A Benchmark for Solving Complex Tasks with Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
  11. 2026RoboMemArena: A Comprehensive and Challenging Robotic Memory Benchmarkcited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MIKASA-Robo-VLA: Benchmarking Memory in VLA Models for Long-Horizon Manipulation
  2. 2026T2Mem: Learning Test-Time Memory for Robotics ↗
  3. 2026MemoryWAM: Efficient World Action Modeling with Persistent Memory
  4. 2026Inline Memory Meets Reusable Skills: Memory-centric Framework for Vision-Language-Action Model
  5. 2026WeaveLA: Event Driven Cross-Subtask Latent Memory Weaving for Repetitive Robot Manipulation
  6. 2026StateMem: Single-State Residual Memory with Adaptive Inference for Vision-Language-Action Policies
  7. 2026Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models on SO-101: Failure and Recovery Analysis
  8. 2026Faster and Better? Benchmark Bugs and Design Limitations Distort the Evaluation of Vision-Language-Action Acceleration