mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Re-calibrated Contrastive Loss for Transformation-Aware Prompt Conditioning in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2609.06967 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring effective transfer learning for vision-language models without compromising their generalization performance is crucial. However, many existing methods overlook data characteristics and simply reuse the training strategies adopted during pre-training. Specifically, they treat same-class samples as distinct instances and transform images independently of their paired text prompts, which makes model learning more difficult. We address these limitations through transformation-aware prompt conditioning and a re-calibrated contrastive loss. Fixed text descriptors identify the transformations applied to paired images, providing transformation-level consistency without altering class semantics. This design aligns the image and text branches at the transformation level, enabling richer representations while preserving the models' ability to generalize. In addition, our loss function mitigates positive-gradient dilution in soft-target cross-entropy when each anchor has multiple valid positives. During transfer, our approach treats same-class samples as positives rather than distinct instances, enabling the model to learn domain-specific features more effectively. Experiments across distribution shift, transfer learning, and few-shot settings demonstrate consistent improvements over existing approaches. Source code for our method is available at https://github.com/SoongE/ReCalCon.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 36 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

36 of 49 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025One Last Attention for Your Vision-Language Model21 Jul
  2. 2024Anchor-based Robust Finetuning of Vision-Language Models9 Apr
  3. 2024Lipsum-FT: Robust Fine-Tuning of Zero-Shot Models Using Random Text Guidance1 Apr
  4. 2023PerceptionCLIP: Visual Classification by Inferring and Conditioning on Contexts2 Aug
  5. 2022Task Residual for Tuning Vision-Language Models18 Nov
  6. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models15 Sep
  7. 2021Tip-Adapter: Training-free CLIP-Adapter for Better Vision-Language Modeling6 Nov
  8. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct
  9. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  5. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  6. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  7. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,884
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  9. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  10. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  11. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  12. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
15 more
  1. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  2. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  3. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  4. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  5. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  6. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  7. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  8. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  9. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  10. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 424
  11. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  12. 2022Finetune like you pretrain: Improved finetuning of zero-shot vision modelscited by 150
  13. 2020The iWildCam 2020 Competition Datasetcited by 86
  14. 2023Not All Features Matter: Enhancing Few-shot CLIP with Adaptive Prior Refinementcited by 84
  15. 2017Noisy Softmax: Improving the Generalization Ability of DCNN via Postponing the Early Softmax Saturationcited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Contrastive Alignment of Vision to Language Through Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning
  2. 2025Prompt-OT: An Optimal Transport Regularization Paradigm for Knowledge Preservation in Vision-Language Model Adaptation
  3. 2025A Closer Look at Conditional Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026Closed-Loop Bidirectional Prompting for Adversarial Robustness of Vision Language Models
  5. 2022Learning Domain Invariant Prompt for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026Neutral-Reference Prompting for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026What Does Prompt Learning Change? -A Natural-Language Concept Analysis of Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024FFF: Fixing Flawed Foundations in contrastive pre-training results in very strong Vision-Language models