mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Group-Based Resource Allocation Model for the Fractional Knapsack Problem

arXiv 2609.06470 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2026cs.DS cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To solve the fractional knapsack problem, Dantzig's greedy rule orders items according to their value-to-cost ratio. This ordering introduces priority issues. An arbitrarily small perturbation to the input can change the allocation if the budget is exhausted between two items with very similar ratios. To mitigate that problem, we introduce a two-stage rule. We group items sharing attributes within a radius δ. We then evaluate these groups in descending order of ratio and divide their group's budget share without further ranking. Consider a group featuring an aggregate capacity UG, unit costs contained in [w^-,w^+], and a representative value widehatv. The group's loss relative to the exact optimum is bounded by widehatv, UGfracw^+-w^-w^++w^-+varepsilonv UG, where varepsilonv limits the group's internal value variation. Moreover, this harmonic factor remains tight for any group size. The overall loss becomes restricted to the single budget-binding group whenever the grouping remains order-compatible; thus, groups containing at most K items suffer a per-item loss of O(fracKn). Should group ratio intervals exhibit an overlap of at most ω, an additive term ω C degrades this bound. Within the separation margin between adjacent groups, the grouped allocation remains Lipschitz continuous with respect to cost data, exhibiting a modulus of fracKwmin. Computing this allocation takes O(n+mlog m+|Gamma|log|Gamma|) time given m groups and a boundary group Gamma. Alternatively, the time complexity drops to O(n+mlog m) if a linear-time selection method identifies the boundary group's allocation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.

Builds on

2 of 27 references.

References · 2

  1. 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
  2. 2021A New Notion of Individually Fair Clustering: α-Equitable k-Centercited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.