Recovering Temporal and Geographic Signals from Language Model Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding whether language-model embeddings encode structured real-world information is important for both representation analysis and information retrieval. We study this question for temporal and geographic signals using a simple projection-based method that operates directly on output embeddings. Given a small set of seed examples, the method defines an axis in embedding space and ranks texts or entities by their projection onto that axis. Our approach is fully black-box and model-agnostic: it requires only embeddings, without access to model weights, internal activations, auxiliary probes, or additional training. This makes it applicable to modern embedding models available only through APIs and provides a lightweight way to analyze whether temporal and spatial dimensions are present in their representation spaces. We apply the method to temporal and geographic datasets and find that embedding projections recover meaningful chronological and spatial structure. These results provide evidence that output embeddings encode signals relevant to time and space, while also offering a practical tool for interpretability and for downstream temporal and geographic information retrieval tasks, such as temporal ordering, geographic ranking, and tagging.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 47 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 506
- 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
- 2021Pre-Trained Models: Past, Present and Futurecited by 319
10 more
- 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
- 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
- 2019Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Modelscited by 189
- 2018The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddingscited by 87
- 2021Time Masking for Temporal Language Modelscited by 46
- 2015Take and Took, Gaggle and Goose, Book and Read: Evaluating the Utility of Vector Differences for Lexical Relation Learningcited by 29
- 2021Do Language Models Know the Way to Rome?cited by 18
- 2024Evaluating the Ability of Large Language Models to Reason about Cardinal Directionscited by 10
- 2019AD3: Attentive Deep Document Datercited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.