mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Damage-Aware Bandit Pruning for Vision and Language Transformers

arXiv 2609.05448 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Structured post-training pruning of transformers requires selecting complete functional units whose suppression causes limited degradation. We formulate structured-unit selection for language and vision transformers as a damage-aware multi-armed bandit problem under a fixed candidate-evaluation budget. Attention heads and MLP channel groups are temporarily masked on calibration batches. Paired damage is the masked loss minus the base loss on the same batch, reducing batch-to-batch variation. A smooth bounded reward drives either a UCB-style policy or fractional-Beta Thompson Sampling, and the final mask is constructed sequentially by adding one unit at each step. The selected units are functionally zeroed in the original dense checkpoint; therefore, the reported parameter effects represent effective structural suppression rather than physical compression or measured speedup. Experiments on WikiText-2, LAMBADA, and Imagenette cover GPT-2, OPT, Pythia, Qwen2.5, SmolLM2, ViT-B/16, DeiT-Tiny, and Swin-Tiny, with comparisons against random, magnitude, static-saliency, and budgeted-greedy selection. Across five seeds, the bandit methods usually reduce degradation relative to budgeted greedy in the paired language-model comparisons. Of 28 comparisons highlighted in the paper, 23 bootstrap confidence intervals exclude zero and 11 paired tests have p < 0.05; six have q < 0.05 after Benjamini-Hochberg correction across the full family of 116 dataset-wise tests. Matched-evaluation results for ViT-B/16 and Swin-Tiny indicate that their gains are not explained solely by a larger candidate-evaluation budget.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

Builds on

14 of 18 references.

References · 14

  1. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  2. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
  3. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  4. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  5. 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
  6. 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
  7. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
  8. 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
  9. 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
  10. 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
  11. 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 335
  12. 2022A Fast Post-Training Pruning Framework for Transformerscited by 162
2 more
  1. 2023Fluctuation-based Adaptive Structured Pruning for Large Language Modelscited by 111
  2. 2023X-Pruner: eXplainable Pruning for Vision Transformerscited by 68

Built on by

Not cited yet.