Training-Free Logical and Structural Anomaly Detection via Calibrated Fusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Industrial anomaly detection must handle two distinct defect families: structural anomalies, which manifest as local texture corruptions, and logical anomalies, which violate global rules on object count, composition, or arrangement. Existing detectors typically favor one family at the expense of the other. In particular, training-free methods effectively exploit frozen representations but lack an explicit notion of object count, while methods that reason about counts usually rely on category-specific component modeling. We show that counting ability can be introduced into training-free anomaly detection without additional training or part-level supervision. Our key idea is a normal-set calibration that aligns heterogeneous anomaly cues using statistics from normal images, enabling their direct fusion within a unified training-free framework. Built upon this calibration, our detector combines complementary frozen cues to address both logical and structural anomalies. On MVTec-LOCO, our method achieves image-level AUROCs of 89.0 and 95.9 on logical and structural anomalies, respectively, yielding a 92.5 average---the best among training-free detectors in our comparison. It remains competitive with methods requiring network training or part annotations, while its structural variant matches PatchCore on MVTec-AD (99.1 image-AUROC), suggesting that the proposed calibration generalizes beyond logical anomaly detection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.
Builds on
12 of 16 references.
References · 12
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 772
- 2023WinCLIP: Zero-/Few-Shot Anomaly Classification and Segmentationcited by 311
- 2023EfficientAD: Accurate Visual Anomaly Detection at Millisecond-Level Latenciescited by 157
- 2023Component-aware anomaly detection framework for adjustable and logical industrial visual inspectioncited by 22
- 2023Few Shot Part Segmentation Reveals Compositional Logic for Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 19
- 2024SAM-LAD: Segment Anything Model Meets Zero-Shot Logic Anomaly Detectioncited by 14
- 2024CSAD: Unsupervised Component Segmentation for Logical Anomaly Detectioncited by 11
- 2024PUAD: Frustratingly Simple Method for Robust Anomaly Detectioncited by 7
- 2023Set Features for Anomaly Detectioncited by 3
- 2026UniSLAD: A Unified Framework for Structural and Logical Industrial Visual Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.