mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Forgetting Without Restarting: Execution-State Unlearning for Stateful LLM Agents

arXiv 2609.04875 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent memory systems

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Long-running LLM agents are stateful: beyond the transcript they accrete compressed summaries, plaintext memory, pending tool plans, and, under every serving API, a KV cache. Yet today's "forget" operations delete a plaintext memory record and stop, leaving every artifact derived from the revoked information intact. We formalize execution-state unlearning: after a forget request, the agent must behave as if it had never observed the target. Modeling the runtime as a deterministic transition system, we prove that the pre-target trajectory prefix is shared with this counterfactual world for free, that the post-target suffix is irreducibly tainted without token-level attribution, and that exact unlearning requires at least T-τ+1 recomputed transitions, where τ is the target's injection step. Provenance-Guided Selective Replay attains this bound as a cross-layer contract spanning prompt, compressed memory, and cache: a provenance graph locates the injection point, checkpoint restoration reduces to cropping the KV cache, and sanitized replay regenerates the counterfactual suffix. Audited with elicitation, stochastic, and string-free behavioral tests across three agent suites, nine baselines, and three model families, memory deletion leaves leakage unchanged, instruction-based forgetting collapses under elicitation (Leak@probes = 1.00), and source redaction still acts on a revoked preference in 80% of episodes, while selective replay is indistinguishable from a full reset at up to 9x fewer recomputed tokens.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent memory systems, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 23 references.

References · 11

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  4. 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
  5. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  6. 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 656
  7. 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 507
  8. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructionscited by 441
  9. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
  10. 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Designcited by 256
  11. 2023Prompt Cache: Modular Attention Reuse for Low-Latency Inferencecited by 255

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026K-Bench: A Benchmark for LLM Unlearning in Agentic Deployments
  2. 2026FlowState: Execution State as Memory for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  3. 2026PLACEMEM: Toward a Compute-Aware Memory Plane for Lifelong Agents
  4. 2026Agentic Unlearning: When LLM Agent Meets Machine Unlearning
  5. 2026Beyond Semantic Organization: Memory as Execution State Management for Long-Horizon Agents
  6. 2026MemGuard: Persisting Verifier Signals for LLM-Agent Memory Governance
  7. 2026Shared Selective Persistent Memory for Agentic LLM Systems
  8. 2026TOKI: A Bitemporal Operator Algebra for Contradiction Resolution in LLM-Agent Persistent Memory