mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Para-Pipe: Exploiting Hierarchical Operator Parallelism of ML Computational Graphs on SoCs

arXiv 2609.04168 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.DC cs.LG cs.PFcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As edge-based deep learning applications become more complex, optimizing performance on heterogeneous System-on-Chips (SoCs) presents unique challenges. Traditional pipelining techniques distributing the computation across different on-chip processing units, while effective for throughput, do not address the latency demands posed by modern neural networks with complex interdependencies and extensive operator parallelism. There is a potential in leveraging operator parallelism to enable concurrent execution across multiple processing units, thereby reducing inference latency. However, prioritizing pipelining or parallel execution often necessitates a compromise, where optimizing one performance metric adversely impacts the other. This paper introduces Para-Pipe, a hierarchical mapping framework that integrates intra- and inter-stage operator parallelism within a pipelined architecture. Para-Pipe navigates the trade-off between throughput and latency by selectively fine-tuning parallelism levels within and across pipeline stages. This strategy can significantly reduce inter-processor communication overhead, significantly improving energy efficiency. Our evaluation demonstrates that Para-Pipe generates multiple Pareto-optimal configurations, achieving a balance between throughput and latency on an Amlogic SoC equipped with ARM big.LITTLE CPUs and GPU, as well as the Black Sesame Technology SoC featuring a deep learning accelerator and two DSPs. More importantly, throughput-optimized configurations under Para-Pipe on Amlogic SoC show an average energy efficiency improvement of 11.0% over purely pipelined strategies and 23.3% relative to non-pipelined parallel execution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 49 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  4. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  5. 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,218
  6. 2022PETR: Position Embedding Transformation for Multi-View 3D Object Detectioncited by 552
  7. 2019Distributed Deep Learning Model for Intelligent Video Surveillance Systems with Edge Computingcited by 28
  8. 2018IoT Security Techniques Based on Machine Learningcited by 22
  9. 2019High-Throughput CNN Inference on Embedded ARM big.LITTLE Multi-Core Processorscited by 19
  10. 2023Map-and-Conquer: Energy-Efficient Mapping of Dynamic Neural Nets onto Heterogeneous MPSoCscited by 9
  11. 2024Model Parallelism on Distributed Infrastructure: A Literature Review from Theory to LLM Case-Studiescited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.