mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Witnesses Explain Anomalies

arXiv 2609.03826 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Unsupervised anomaly detection scores each point of an unlabelled, contaminated sample in a single pass, and increasingly must also explain why a point is flagged. Yet the dominant detectors give a score with no account of which features drive it, and explanations are bolted on post-hoc with SHAP or LIME, which re-query the detector thousands of times per point and only approximate it. We introduce WAND, an unsupervised tabular anomaly detector that is explainable by design. WAND organises its computation around directions on the unit sphere, scoring each point by how far its projection escapes a sub-Gaussian extreme-value baseline. The originality of our approach is that the witness directions that flag a point, being vectors in feature space, are its explanation, a per-feature attribution obtained at no cost over scoring and, since the score is differentiable, recoverable by gradients. Scoring is linear in the sample size, and a probe-efficiency bound guarantees every anomaly a witness, hence an explanation. Across 47 ADBench datasets WAND attains the best mean Friedman rank at ROC-AUC parity with 16 unsupervised baselines, so the gain is interpretability at no accuracy cost; its native explanations are more accurate and faithful than post-hoc SHAP/LIME and ECOD at a fraction of the query cost. WAND is thus a practical, interpretable solution for explainable anomaly detection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 50 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  4. 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 232
  5. 2019PyOD: A Python Toolbox for Scalable Outlier Detectioncited by 222
  6. 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 214
  7. 2020Fast Differentiable Sorting and Rankingcited by 197
  8. 2022ECOD: Unsupervised Outlier Detection Using Empirical Cumulative Distribution Functionscited by 153
  9. 2020COPOD: Copula-Based Outlier Detectioncited by 146
  10. 2019Differentiable Ranks and Sorting using Optimal Transportcited by 113
  11. 2023On Diffusion Modeling for Anomaly Detectioncited by 72
  12. 2021LUNAR: Unifying Local Outlier Detection Methods via Graph Neural Networkscited by 42
7 more
  1. 2018LSCP: Locally Selective Combination in Parallel Outlier Ensemblescited by 32
  2. 2019Explaining Anomalies Detected by Autoencoders Using SHAPcited by 27
  3. 2019Shapley Values of Reconstruction Errors of PCA for Explaining Anomaly Detectioncited by 19
  4. 2019PIDForest: Anomaly Detection via Partial Identificationcited by 13
  5. 2020Interpretable Anomaly Detection with DIFFI: Depth-based Isolation Forest Feature Importancecited by 12
  6. 2023TabADM: Unsupervised Tabular Anomaly Detection with Diffusion Modelscited by 5
  7. 2026Unsupervised Symbolic Anomaly Detectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.