mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Projected Riemannian Gradient Descent for the Bures-Wasserstein Barycenter: Dimension-Independent Linear Convergence at Unit Step Size

arXiv 2609.03762 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.LG math.OC quant-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The computation of the Bures-Wasserstein (BW) barycenter of an ensemble of positive definite matrices arises throughout machine learning, optimal transport, and quantum information. Riemannian gradient descent (RGD) at unit step size -- the fixed-point iteration used in practice -- converges rapidly, yet existing analyses present a dichotomy: unit-step guarantees carry worst-case exponential dependence on the dimension, while dimension-independent guarantees require small step sizes that forfeit the empirical speed. We resolve this dichotomy, not by improving the guarantees for unit-step RGD, but by proposing a Projected RGD algorithm that achieves dimension-independent linear convergence at unit step size. The achieved rate, (1 - kappa-3/2), where kappa is the condition number of the ensemble, also polynomially improves on the best small-step guarantee (kappa3/2 versus kappa5/2 iteration complexity). The crux is a novel Projection Lemma: clipping the eigenvalues of a positive matrix to an interval [α, β] is the closed-form, non-expansive (1-Lipschitz) BW-metric projection onto the set S : α I ≤ S ≤ β I -- a statement which, unlike its known one-sided counterpart, does not follow from convexity. The projection is moreover free: it reuses an eigendecomposition the next iteration must perform in any case, so the projected and unprojected iterations cost the same per step. The same analysis covers the invariant matrix projection problem of Brahmachari et al. (2025), whose fixed-point algorithm we identify as unit-step RGD on a totally geodesic submanifold, thereby extending the dimension-independent guarantee to that setting verbatim.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

7 of 41 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 539
  2. 2018Statistical Aspects of Wasserstein Distancescited by 203
  3. 2022Variational inference via Wasserstein gradient flowscited by 85
  4. 2021Averaging on the Bures-Wasserstein manifold: dimension-free convergence of gradient descentcited by 32
  5. 2017Fr'echet Means and Procrustes Analysis in Wasserstein Spacecited by 18
  6. 2022Bures-Wasserstein Barycenters and Low-Rank Matrix Recoverycited by 5
  7. 2026Anderson Mixing in Bures Wasserstein Space of Gaussian Measurescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.