mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RecurTrace: Adaptive Latent Reasoning with Loop-Time Memory

arXiv 2609.03379 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Repeating a small block of middle layers increases a language model's effective inference depth without adding parameters or generating extra tokens, and recent work shows that this latent recurrence improves reasoning. However, two design choices limit these gains. Each iteration sees only the previous output and cannot directly access earlier computations. Moreover, a fixed loop count wastes depth on easy inputs while leaving hard ones with too little computation. We introduce RecurTrace, which addresses both limitations using the loop's own trajectory. Specifically, Loop Memory Attention lets each looped layer attend to its own states from previous iterations along the loop-time axis, so the model can revisit earlier computations instead of relying on the latest state alone. A halting head then reads the loop state and predicts whether to continue, with supervision from an oracle that identifies when additional depth still reduces loss. In a controlled MathQA comparison on the same looped backbone, RecurTrace achieves 56.9% accuracy with an average of 2.0 loops, exceeding the best fixed loop depth by 2.2 points at matched compute. By comparison, ACT and PonderNet collapse to one loop, and CALM reaches only 54.1% with 5.6 loops, while the stronger LoopUS-Conf and TaH-Mismatch baselines reach 55.3% at 3.2 loops and 55.7% at 2.1 loops. Finally, RecurTrace improves generation accuracy over same-budget fine-tuned baselines at 0.6B, 1.7B, 4B, and 8B, with the gain growing with model size from 0.6 to 3.4 points.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 1 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2026.

Builds on

1 of 58 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026LoopUS: Recasting Pretrained LLMs into Looped Latent Refinement Models10 May

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026A Mechanistic Analysis of Looped Reasoning Language Models
  2. 2025Scaling up Test-Time Compute with Latent Reasoning: A Recurrent Depth Approach
  3. 2026Penelope: Localized Latent Recurrence for Efficient Structured Reasoning
  4. 2026Stabilizing Recurrent Dynamics for Test-Time Scalable Latent Reasoning in Looped Language Models
  5. 2026Steering Recurrent Reasoners at Inference Time with Readout Feedback
  6. 2026Latent Recurrent Thoughts: Recurrent Refinement of Proposed Latents for Reasoning with Frozen LLMs
  7. 2025Encode, Think, Decode: Scaling test-time reasoning with recursive latent thoughts
  8. 2026Allocating Recurrent Compute in Looped Language Models