Bounded Personas Match Retrieval on Classification but Not Regression for a Frozen Agent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A personalized language agent must convert a user's interaction history into behavior on each new request at inference time. Two strategies dominate. Retrieval pulls a few of the user's most relevant past items into the prompt, which is accurate but pays a per-query selection and context cost that grows with the history. Distillation instead compresses the history once into a compact natural-language persona, which is bounded, query-independent, and interpretable, but is widely assumed to sacrifice accuracy. Whether, and on which tasks, a distilled persona can match retrieval has not been characterized cleanly. We introduce PersonaLink, a training-free method that distills a user's history into a bounded three-field persona and recursively refines it: each pass self-evaluates the frozen agent on a held-out slice of the user's own labeled history, rewrites the persona from its errors, and keeps the result only when it does not regress on that slice. Because every comparison shares one frozen 7B backbone and differs only in what is placed in context, the design isolates the effect of representation from that of the model. The result is a clear task-type asymmetry. On 200 users of LaMP-2 (15-way news categorization), PersonaLink reaches 0.745-0.755 accuracy, statistically indistinguishable from BM25 retrieval (0.760-0.765).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 80 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
80 of 83 references.
References · 80
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
38 more
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,210
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,195
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
- 2022Large Language Models Are Human-Level Prompt Engineerscited by 1,045
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 1,017
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 940
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 876
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
- 2018Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?cited by 828
- 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 792
- 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 783
- 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 702
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
- 2022Large Language Models Can Self-Improvecited by 664
- 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 648
- 2023MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term Memorycited by 556
- 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 551
- 2025GEPA: Reflective Prompt Evolution Can Outperform Reinforcement Learningcited by 542
- 2023LaMP: When Large Language Models Meet Personalizationcited by 437
- 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 398
- 2024Agent Workflow Memorycited by 383
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 379
- 2023Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playingcited by 339
- 2022Demonstrate-Search-Predict: Composing retrieval and language models for knowledge-intensive NLPcited by 318
- 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 286
- 2023Personalized Soups: Personalized Large Language Model Alignment via Post-hoc Parameter Mergingcited by 280
- 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 240
- 2024From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agentscited by 212
- 2024Two Tales of Persona in LLMs: A Survey of Role-Playing and Personalizationcited by 208
- 2024Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judgecited by 204
- 2019TransferTransfo: A Transfer Learning Approach for Neural Network Based Conversational Agentscited by 188
50 most cited of 80 All 80 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.