Bonded Recourse for Smart-Contract Settlement of Compensable Agent Side Effects
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous agent runtimes execute tool actions that mutate databases, repositories, and cloud services across organizational boundaries. Authorization and local compensation cover pre-action admission and in-runtime rollback, but neither settles the residual harm left after a permitted action fails. We design Recourse, a smart-contract settlement protocol for compensable agent side effects that binds each admitted action to scope, recovery, evidence, payout, and collateral. Recourse separates ex ante eligibility from ex post objective settleability: typed receipts make objective residual claims computable under an optimistic-oracle challenge pattern, while subjective or incomplete claims route to ERC-792 arbitration or exclusion. We implement the contract suite, deploy it on Base Sepolia, build adapters against Postgres, Git, and cloud-compatible local sandboxes, and evaluate the system on a deterministic harness, sandbox traces, adversarial sweeps, and property-based fuzzing. Against authorization-only and local-compensation baselines, bonded coverage cuts uncompensated harm. The on-chain tier supplies neutral custody, public challenge, non-cooperative payout, and portable history under cross-organizational trust assumptions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Holding Agents Accountable with Verifiable Agent Insurance13 Oct 2026