CRISP: Cliff-awaRe Input-adaptive Sparse Prefilling with Structural-Mass-Motivated Routing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The attention prefilling phase of long-context LLM inference scales quadratically, making self-attention a severe computational bottleneck. Traditional sparse attention methods mitigate this through fixed patterns or offline profiling, but lack the flexibility to adapt to input-dependent attention structure. Recent dynamic methods address this by routing heads to sparse patterns in real-time, but rely on indirect routing proxies with overhead and budget allocation mechanisms that overlook the post-softmax mass hierarchy. We present CRISP (Cliff-awaRe Input-adaptive Sparse Prefilling), which identifies and addresses two structural challenges in this dynamic routing paradigm. First, we show that the routing decision can be read directly off the structure of the proxy attention map. We replace the Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JSD) routing with C_struct, a structural proxy that measures mass at Vertical-Slash compatible positions and reproduces JSD's routing decisions while eliminating both the pooled matmul and subsequent KL divergence overhead. Second, we formalize the post-softmax mass cliff and demonstrate theoretically that strictly cumulative coverage thresholds accumulate O(n) background noise at long contexts. CRISP navigates this via a sink-aware threshold grounded in the noise floor. Empirically, across InfiniteBench, RULER and LongBench on two model families, CRISP is the strongest sparse method overall and matches or exceeds exact dense attention on retrieval-heavy benchmarks, recovering up to +28.0 pp on retrieval tasks over baselines and achieving up to a 5.30x attention speedup at 512k tokens, driven primarily by our O(n) noise elimination during selection while preserving structural integrity.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
19 of 25 references.
References · 19
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2020Longformer: The Long-Document Transformercited by 3,413
- 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,598
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
- 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,546
- 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
- 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,346
- 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 532
- 2024Quest: Query-Aware Sparsity for Efficient Long-Context LLM Inferencecited by 501
- 2024MInference 1.0: Accelerating Pre-filling for Long-Context LLMs via Dynamic Sparse Attentioncited by 383
- 2024∞Bench: Extending Long Context Evaluation Beyond 100K Tokenscited by 367
- 2025FlexPrefill: A Context-Aware Sparse Attention Mechanism for Efficient Long-Sequence Inferencecited by 123
7 more
- 2023SparQ Attention: Bandwidth-Efficient LLM Inferencecited by 119
- 2024MagicPIG: LSH Sampling for Efficient LLM Generationcited by 111
- 2025Twilight: Adaptive Attention Sparsity with Hierarchical Top-p Pruningcited by 49
- 2021On the Expressive Power of Self-Attention Matricescited by 47
- 2024Mixture of Attention Spans: Optimizing LLM Inference Efficiency with Heterogeneous Sliding-Window Lengthscited by 44
- 2025The Sparse Frontier: Sparse Attention Trade-offs in Transformer LLMscited by 29
- 2021Transformer Acceleration with Dynamic Sparse Attentioncited by 19
Built on by
Not cited yet.