GAPS: Dimension-Level Gates for Conditional Activation Steering
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Activation steering methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Activation steering suppresses undesired behaviors in language models by adding a steering vector to the hidden state during generation. Recent conditional methods such as CAST and DSAS improve the behavior-capability trade-off by deciding when to intervene, but once active, they apply the full dense vector to all hidden dimensions, regardless of whether a neuron carries concept information or already lies in the desired regime. We introduce dimension-level conditioning as a complementary axis of selectivity that also decides which neurons to intervene on. Our method, GAPS (Gated Activation steering via Posterior and Separability), combines two training-free gates: a static separability gate that restricts steering to neurons with statistically reliable concept information (via AUROC), and a dynamic posterior gate that steers a neuron only when its current activation is better explained by the undesired concept under a Gaussian model. The gates add O(D) overhead per token, and they plug into existing conditional methods. On toxicity mitigation (RealToxicityPrompts) and concept removal (OneSeC) with Gemma-3 (4B) and Qwen-3 (1.7B), GAPS consistently matches or improves the Pareto front of its token-level counterparts; under a fixed capability budget, DSAS+GAPS reduces Gemma-3's toxicity rate from 6.52% to 0.48%, versus 3.52% for DSAS alone. Ablations attribute most of the gain to the posterior gate.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Activation steering methods, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025LinEAS: End-to-end Learning of Activation Steering with a Distributional Loss11 Mar
- 2024Semantics-Adaptive Activation Intervention for LLMs via Dynamic Steering Vectors16 Oct
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Addition9 Dec
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineering20 Aug
Other references · 13
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,255
- 2024Programming Refusal with Conditional Activation Steeringcited by 206
- 2024Adaptive Activation Steering: A Tuning-Free LLM Truthfulness Improvement Method for Diverse Hallucinations Categoriescited by 77
- 2024Controlling Language and Diffusion Models by Transporting Activationscited by 68
- 2025FairSteer: Inference Time Debiasing for LLMs with Dynamic Activation Steeringcited by 40
- 2024Whispering Experts: Neural Interventions for Toxicity Mitigation in Language Modelscited by 32
- 2025To Steer or Not to Steer? Mechanistic Error Reduction with Abstention for Language Modelscited by 29
- 2025Guiding Giants: Lightweight Controllers for Weighted Activation Steering in LLMscited by 8
- 2025Neurons Speak in Ranges: Breaking Free from Discrete Neuronal Attributioncited by 5
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Leverage Is Not Reach: A Control-Window Law for Single-Neuron Steering in Language Models
- 2026On the Steering Dimensionality of Refusal in Language Models
- 2026OPIUM: Mitigating Steering Externalities and Over-Refusal via Dual Objective Latent Optimization
- 2026Targeted Neuron Modulation via Contrastive Pair Search
- 2025The Rogue Scalpel: Activation Steering Compromises LLM Safety
- 2026Steer2Edit: From Activation Steering to Component-Level Editing
- 2026On the Non-Identifiability of Steering Vectors in Large Language Models
- 2026Does Fine-Tuning Undo Activation Steering? Behavioural Recovery Without Weight-Edit Reversal