A Composable Evaluation System for Reproducible Omni-Modal Foundation Model Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Building an omni-modal foundation model means evaluating it across text, image, video, and audio. Excellent evaluation toolkits exist for each modality, but their inference engines, prompt conventions, and metric implementations are mutually incompatible, so practitioners end up maintaining separate environments for every toolchain and still struggle to compare results across them. OmniEvaluator grew out of this need in our own model development: rather than reimplementing benchmarks, it connects existing inference engines and curated evaluation libraries at a higher level, exposing four inference backends, four evaluation frameworks, and over a thousand benchmarks through a single interface. Every run is recorded as an artifact capturing the full configuration for exact reproduction, and results flow into a shared dashboard for cross-model comparison. A federated mode shares GPU inference servers across concurrent evaluations, and a built-in verifier, small enough to run on CPU, keeps its score stable across engines and prompts where rule-based scoring fluctuates under configuration mismatch, matching cost-efficient commercial LLM judges without their recurring API cost. The system, demo video, and dashboard are publicly available. (https://github.com/naver-ai/omni-evaluator)
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 29 references.
References · 18
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,141
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
- 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
- 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 310
- 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
- 2024VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistantscited by 200
- 2025VITA-1.5: Towards GPT-4o Level Real-Time Vision and Speech Interactioncited by 197
6 more
- 2024When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboardscited by 137
- 2024AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Modelscited by 128
- 2025xVerify: Efficient Answer Verifier for Reasoning Model Evaluationscited by 55
- 2025CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Rewardcited by 40
- 2026UltraEval-Audio: A Unified Framework for Comprehensive Evaluation of Audio Foundation Modelscited by 6
- 2024Evalverse: Unified and Accessible Library for Large Language Model Evaluationcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.