Solving In-Table Prediction Problems by Deep Neural Networks with Performance Evaluation Using Synthetic Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Tabular deep learning (TDL) leverages neural networks (NN) to extract patterns from tabular data. Traditional TDL methods follow a supervised learning paradigm, where a target feature is explicitly given. In this work, however, we explore a different approach by employing deep NNs to learn relationships among individual columns within a given table. We investigate whether NNs can predict the values of arbitrarily selected columns in a given table based on the remaining known columns. We call this problem In-Table Prediction (ITB), which is slightly different from table imputation methods and the pretraining task of TDL. Three potential usage scenarios are identified, which, to our best knowledge, have not been extensively studied in the literature. A self-supervised learning approach is applied to address this problem by randomly selecting columns to be masked out and used as learning targets. This work focuses on tabular datasets containing only continuous features. To handle missing values in continuous features, a novel neural layer is proposed to embed both numerical and empty values. Synthetic data is generated based on predefined column relationships, with empty values inserted using two distinct mechanisms. Additionally, an adapted masking strategy is employed to create test data. Performances of three NN architectures, namely MLP, Resnet and Transformer, are evaluated using the generated synthetic data. We conclude that, the attention-based structure outperforms the other two networks, when a sufficiently large number of training examples is available and a relatively large embedding length is chosen. We stress that these findings are obtained under controlled, synthetic conditions with a small number of columns and it should therefore be regarded as an initial, narrowly-scoped investigation rather than a general characterization of ITP on real-world tabular data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
24 of 38 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 740
- 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
- 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
- 2020TabTransformer: Tabular Data Modeling Using Contextual Embeddingscited by 409
- 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
- 2021SAINT: Improved Neural Networks for Tabular Data via Row Attention and Contrastive Pre-Trainingcited by 319
- 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
- 2021SCARF: Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning using Random Feature Corruptioncited by 156
12 more
- 2018Handling Incomplete Heterogeneous Data using VAEscited by 149
- 2022TransTab: Learning Transferable Tabular Transformers Across Tablescited by 132
- 2021SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 104
- 2023XTab: Cross-table Pretraining for Tabular Transformerscited by 81
- 2019MisGAN: Learning from Incomplete Data with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 75
- 2020The gap between theory and practice in function approximation with deep neural networkscited by 54
- 2022Revisiting Pretraining Objectives for Tabular Deep Learningcited by 43
- 2024SwitchTab: Switched Autoencoders Are Effective Tabular Learnerscited by 38
- 2021Approximation capability of two hidden layer feedforward neural networks with fixed weightscited by 24
- 2019Improving Missing Data Imputation with Deep Generative Modelscited by 19
- 2024A Survey on Deep Tabular Learningcited by 18
- 2018Missing Value Imputation Based on Deep Generative Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.