CARE: Contrastive Anchor-based Rubric Evolution for Large Language Model Post-Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rubric-based reinforcement learning decomposes open-ended instructions into prompt-specific, flexible rubrics, making it better suited than reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards for post-training LLMs on open-ended tasks. However, static rubrics are inevitably hacked as the policy evolves, and existing dynamic approaches introduce new problems: undirected rubric extraction, unreliable hack detection, and unbounded rubric proliferation. We propose CARE (Contrastive Anchor-based Rubric Evolution), which grounds every rubric evolution step in a high-quality anchor response generated by a frontier model conditioned on the prompt and its rubrics. At each training step, CARE contrasts the highest-scoring rollout against the anchor, enabling two complementary mechanisms: an Adaptive branch that reactively repairs reward misspecification; and a Chase branch that proactively converts frontier-level quality gaps into sharper rubrics. Together, the two branches maintain discriminative accuracy in the high-reward region---the precise region where reward over-optimization mostly originates. Experiments on WildChecklist-9K with Qwen2.5-7B-Base and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct show that CARE achieves state-of-the-art performance on Arena-Hard-2.0, InfoBench, and FollowBench, and is the only method whose win rate against GPT-4.1 anchor responses shows sustained improvement throughout 300 training steps; additional results on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct and Qwen3-8B further indicate that CARE generalizes across model families.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.
Builds on
29 of 52 references.
References · 29
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
17 more
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 598
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2023Fine-Grained Human Feedback Gives Better Rewards for Language Model Trainingcited by 399
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 233
- 2023Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate Overoptimizationcited by 225
- 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 195
- 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoningcited by 149
- 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignmentcited by 118
- 2025Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language Modelscited by 115
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchorscited by 108
- 2025DR Tulu: Reinforcement Learning with Evolving Rubrics for Deep Researchcited by 98
- 2025Chasing the Tail: Effective Rubric-based Reward Modeling for Large Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 46
- 2025VerIF: Verification Engineering for Reinforcement Learning in Instruction Followingcited by 43
- 2025Online Rubrics Elicitation from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 41
- 2026The Hitchhikers Guide to Rubric Quality Understanding and Enrichmentcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.