mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

It Takes Two to Match: Co-Evolving Generative Retriever with Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2609.00638 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2026cs.IR cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL training of language and agent models

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval is the first stage of modern search and advertising systems, selecting a candidate set from a large item universe for downstream ranking and auction. Recent work increasingly leverages LLMs to improve retrieval through query expansion, data synthesis, and retrieval-feedback training. However, the generative component is typically used for query-side augmentation, while final matching is still delegated to a downstream retriever. We introduce CoGR, a retrieval framework that instead trains LLMs to directly construct retrieval representations on both query and item sides. Each generator produces a compact set of keywords, which are matched directly through an inverted index, preserving compatibility with existing keyword-based retrieval infrastructure. CoGR uses a two-stage training pipeline. Supervised fine-tuning first establishes an aligned keyword space, after which co-evolving reinforcement learning alternately optimizes the query- and item-side generators with GRPO against the opposite side's frozen index. Both sides optimize the same query-to-item retrieval F1 objective: the query side receives retrieval F1 directly, while the item side receives a counterfactual marginal reward measuring the change in query-side F1 caused by its generated keywords. Across 10 representative sparse, dense, and generative baselines, CoGR achieves the best performance on both an internal APP Marketplace dataset and the public WANDS benchmark, improving F1 over the strongest baseline by 10.9% and 36.1%, respectively. Further analysis shows stable co-evolution and increasingly aligned query--item keyword spaces over training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 41 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2026.

Builds on

41 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Token-level Proximal Policy Optimization for Query Generation1 Nov

Other references · 40

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  5. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
  6. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,444
  7. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
  8. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 517
  9. 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 456
  10. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 413
  11. 2020Autoregressive Entity Retrievalcited by 334
  12. 2021SPLADE: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for First Stage Rankingcited by 286
28 more
  1. 2022Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Indexcited by 247
  2. 2025R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Datacited by 228
  3. 2023Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Modelscited by 213
  4. 2023Query2doc: Query Expansion with Large Language Modelscited by 149
  5. 2022Autoregressive Search Engines: Generating Substrings as Document Identifierscited by 113
  6. 2022A Neural Corpus Indexer for Document Retrievalcited by 111
  7. 2022From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More Effectivecited by 98
  8. 2024From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrievalcited by 89
  9. 2021A Few Brief Notes on DeepImpact, COIL, and a Conceptual Framework for Information Retrieval Techniquescited by 69
  10. 2021Learning Passage Impacts for Inverted Indexescited by 68
  11. 2023Learning to Tokenize for Generative Retrievalcited by 68
  12. 2025DeepRetrieval: Hacking Real Search Engines and Retrievers with Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learningcited by 66
  13. 2023Learning to Rank in Generative Retrievalcited by 46
  14. 2025s3: You Don't Need That Much Data to Train a Search Agent via RLcited by 42
  15. 2023Scalable and Effective Generative Information Retrievalcited by 39
  16. 2024Planning Ahead in Generative Retrieval: Guiding Autoregressive Generation through Simultaneous Decodingcited by 19
  17. 2023GLEN: Generative Retrieval via Lexical Index Learningcited by 17
  18. 2024Corpus-Steered Query Expansion with Large Language Modelscited by 17
  19. 2026G-Zero: Self-Play for Open-Ended Generation from Zero Datacited by 17
  20. 2023Multiview Identifiers Enhanced Generative Retrievalcited by 16
  21. 2023Auto Search Indexer for End-to-End Document Retrievalcited by 16
  22. 2025R1-RE: Cross-Domain Relation Extraction with RLVRcited by 11
  23. 2025ExpandR: Teaching Dense Retrievers Beyond Queries with LLM Guidancecited by 10
  24. 2025Lightweight and Direct Document Relevance Optimization for Generative Information Retrievalcited by 9
  25. 2025Real-time Ad retrieval via LLM-generative Commercial Intention for Sponsored Search Advertisingcited by 8
  26. 2024Generative Retrieval Meets Multi-Graded Relevancecited by 6
  27. 2023Model-enhanced Vector Indexcited by 5
  28. 2023Summarization-Based Document IDs for Generative Retrieval with Language Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025QueStER: Query Specification for Generative keyword-based Retrieval
  2. 2026CoSearch: Joint Training of Reasoning and Document Ranking via Reinforcement Learning for Agentic Search
  3. 2026Harness-G: A Graph-Structured Harness for Search Agents
  4. 2026Understanding the Behaviors of Environment-aware Information Retrieval
  5. 2025Rethinking On-policy Optimization for Query Augmentation
  6. 2025Think Before You Retrieve: Learning Test-Time Adaptive Search with Small Language Models
  7. 2025ParallelSearch: Train your LLMs to Decompose Query and Search Sub-queries in Parallel with Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025ReZero: Enhancing LLM search ability by trying one-more-time